[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211129130653.2037928-12-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:06:53 +0000
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, boqun.feng@...il.com, bp@...en8.de,
catalin.marinas@....com, dvyukov@...gle.com, efuller@...hat.com,
elver@...gle.com, ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, jonas@...thpole.se,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, luto@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, mattst88@...il.com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
mingo@...hat.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, paulus@...ba.org, peterz@...radead.org,
rth@...ddle.net, shorne@...il.com,
stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi, tglx@...utronix.de,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, will@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 11/11] x86: snapshot thread flags
Some thread flags can be set remotely, and so even when IRQs are
disabled, the flags can change under our feet. Generally this is
unlikely to cause a problem in practice, but it is somewhat unsound, and
KCSAN will legitimately warn that there is a data race.
To avoid such issues, a snapshot of the flags has to be taken prior to
using them. Some places already use READ_ONCE() for that, others do not.
Convert them all to the new flag accessor helpers.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/kernel/process.h | 4 ++--
arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index e9ee8b526319..180d7a00cb66 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ void arch_setup_new_exec(void)
clear_thread_flag(TIF_SSBD);
task_clear_spec_ssb_disable(current);
task_clear_spec_ssb_noexec(current);
- speculation_ctrl_update(task_thread_info(current)->flags);
+ speculation_ctrl_update(read_thread_flags());
}
}
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static unsigned long speculation_ctrl_update_tif(struct task_struct *tsk)
clear_tsk_thread_flag(tsk, TIF_SPEC_IB);
}
/* Return the updated threadinfo flags*/
- return task_thread_info(tsk)->flags;
+ return read_task_thread_flags(tsk);
}
void speculation_ctrl_update(unsigned long tif)
@@ -653,8 +653,8 @@ void __switch_to_xtra(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
{
unsigned long tifp, tifn;
- tifn = READ_ONCE(task_thread_info(next_p)->flags);
- tifp = READ_ONCE(task_thread_info(prev_p)->flags);
+ tifn = read_task_thread_flags(next_p);
+ tifp = read_task_thread_flags(prev_p);
switch_to_bitmap(tifp);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.h b/arch/x86/kernel/process.h
index 1d0797b2338a..76b547b83232 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.h
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ void __switch_to_xtra(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p);
static inline void switch_to_extra(struct task_struct *prev,
struct task_struct *next)
{
- unsigned long next_tif = task_thread_info(next)->flags;
- unsigned long prev_tif = task_thread_info(prev)->flags;
+ unsigned long next_tif = read_task_thread_flags(next);
+ unsigned long prev_tif = read_task_thread_flags(prev);
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP)) {
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 59ba2968af1b..92bb03b9ceb5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static void l1d_flush_evaluate(unsigned long prev_mm, unsigned long next_mm,
static unsigned long mm_mangle_tif_spec_bits(struct task_struct *next)
{
- unsigned long next_tif = task_thread_info(next)->flags;
+ unsigned long next_tif = read_task_thread_flags(next);
unsigned long spec_bits = (next_tif >> TIF_SPEC_IB) & LAST_USER_MM_SPEC_MASK;
/*
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists