[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h8rx758g3.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:43:08 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the sound-current tree
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 15:29:36 +0100,
Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:23:07AM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> > > Mark, could you resolve in the latter branch?
> >
> > I'll just leave them for now, Linus got angry about merging up fixes
> > just to resolve conflicts so if it's not an actual dependency...
>
> the asoc for-5.17 branch does have all the needed changes and the
> linux-next merged version seems ok. We've already sent many further
> changes that touch this area of code to asoc for-5.17. Let me know if some
> actions are needed to help.
The question is rather whether this discrepancy would cause a problem
for further developments. If back-merging 5.16 stuff makes things
easier, it should be done so. OTOH, if it's just for resolving the
conflict in the final tree, we can leave it.
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists