| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <47228209-552e-b148-c93a-4fbb5a36583e@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 05:25:02 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
mka@...omium.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de,
lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
quic_kgunda@...cinc.com, quic_aghayal@...cinc.com,
daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
quic_subbaram@...cinc.com, jic23@...nel.org, amitk@...nel.org,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/4] thermal: qcom: Add support for multiple
generations of devices
On 23/11/2021 08:57, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
> Refactor code to support multiple generations of ADC_TM devices
> by defining gen number, irq name and disable, configure and isr
> APIs in the individual data structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Minor question below.
> ---
> drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
> index 824671c..fc8cd45 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
> @@ -78,11 +78,10 @@ enum adc5_timer_select {
> ADC5_TIMER_SEL_NONE,
> };
>
> -struct adc_tm5_data {
> - const u32 full_scale_code_volt;
> - unsigned int *decimation;
> - unsigned int *hw_settle;
> - bool is_hc;
> +enum adc5_gen {
> + ADC_TM5,
> + ADC_TM_HC,
> + ADC_TM5_MAX
> };
>
> enum adc_tm5_cal_method {
> @@ -92,6 +91,18 @@ enum adc_tm5_cal_method {
> };
>
> struct adc_tm5_chip;
> +struct adc_tm5_channel;
> +
> +struct adc_tm5_data {
> + const u32 full_scale_code_volt;
> + unsigned int *decimation;
> + unsigned int *hw_settle;
> + int (*disable_channel)(struct adc_tm5_channel *channel);
> + int (*configure)(struct adc_tm5_channel *channel, int low, int high);
> + irqreturn_t (*isr)(int irq, void *data);
> + char *irq_name;
> + int gen;
> +};
Any reason for moving the adc_tm5_data definition? It is still prefix
with the adc_tmp5_channel declaration.
>
> /**
> * struct adc_tm5_channel - ADC Thermal Monitoring channel data.
> @@ -139,22 +150,6 @@ struct adc_tm5_chip {
> u16 base;
> };
>
> -static const struct adc_tm5_data adc_tm5_data_pmic = {
> - .full_scale_code_volt = 0x70e4,
> - .decimation = (unsigned int []) { 250, 420, 840 },
> - .hw_settle = (unsigned int []) { 15, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700,
> - 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000, 32000,
> - 64000, 128000 },
> -};
> -
> -static const struct adc_tm5_data adc_tm_hc_data_pmic = {
> - .full_scale_code_volt = 0x70e4,
> - .decimation = (unsigned int []) { 256, 512, 1024 },
> - .hw_settle = (unsigned int []) { 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700,
> - 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, 8000, 10000 },
> - .is_hc = true,
> -};
> -
> static int adc_tm5_read(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm, u16 offset, u8 *data, int len)
> {
> return regmap_bulk_read(adc_tm->regmap, adc_tm->base + offset, data, len);
> @@ -343,14 +338,14 @@ static int adc_tm5_set_trips(void *data, int low, int high)
> channel->channel, low, high);
>
> if (high == INT_MAX && low <= -INT_MAX)
> - ret = adc_tm5_disable_channel(channel);
> + ret = chip->data->disable_channel(channel);
> else
> - ret = adc_tm5_configure(channel, low, high);
> + ret = chip->data->configure(channel, low, high);
>
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops adc_tm5_ops = {
> +static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops adc_tm5_thermal_ops = {
> .get_temp = adc_tm5_get_temp,
> .set_trips = adc_tm5_set_trips,
> };
> @@ -366,7 +361,7 @@ static int adc_tm5_register_tzd(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm)
> tzd = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(adc_tm->dev,
> adc_tm->channels[i].channel,
> &adc_tm->channels[i],
> - &adc_tm5_ops);
> + &adc_tm5_thermal_ops);
> if (IS_ERR(tzd)) {
> if (PTR_ERR(tzd) == -ENODEV) {
> dev_warn(adc_tm->dev, "thermal sensor on channel %d is not used\n",
> @@ -526,6 +521,31 @@ static int adc_tm5_get_dt_channel_data(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const struct adc_tm5_data adc_tm5_data_pmic = {
> + .full_scale_code_volt = 0x70e4,
> + .decimation = (unsigned int []) { 250, 420, 840 },
> + .hw_settle = (unsigned int []) { 15, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700,
> + 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000, 32000,
> + 64000, 128000 },
> + .disable_channel = adc_tm5_disable_channel,
> + .configure = adc_tm5_configure,
> + .isr = adc_tm5_isr,
> + .irq_name = "pm-adc-tm5",
> + .gen = ADC_TM5,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct adc_tm5_data adc_tm_hc_data_pmic = {
> + .full_scale_code_volt = 0x70e4,
> + .decimation = (unsigned int []) { 256, 512, 1024 },
> + .hw_settle = (unsigned int []) { 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700,
> + 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, 8000, 10000 },
> + .disable_channel = adc_tm5_disable_channel,
> + .configure = adc_tm5_configure,
> + .isr = adc_tm5_isr,
> + .irq_name = "pm-adc-tm5",
> + .gen = ADC_TM_HC,
> +};
> +
> static int adc_tm5_get_dt_data(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm, struct device_node *node)
> {
> struct adc_tm5_channel *channels;
> @@ -623,7 +643,7 @@ static int adc_tm5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - if (adc_tm->data->is_hc)
> + if (adc_tm->data->gen == ADC_TM_HC)
> ret = adc_tm_hc_init(adc_tm);
> else
> ret = adc_tm5_init(adc_tm);
> @@ -638,8 +658,8 @@ static int adc_tm5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, adc_tm5_isr,
> - IRQF_ONESHOT, "pm-adc-tm5", adc_tm);
> + return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, adc_tm->data->isr,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT, adc_tm->data->irq_name, adc_tm);
> }
>
> static const struct of_device_id adc_tm5_match_table[] = {
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists