lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 29 Nov 2021 05:25:02 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        mka@...omium.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de,
        lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
        manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        quic_kgunda@...cinc.com, quic_aghayal@...cinc.com,
        daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, rui.zhang@...el.com,
        quic_subbaram@...cinc.com, jic23@...nel.org, amitk@...nel.org,
        Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/4] thermal: qcom: Add support for multiple
 generations of devices

On 23/11/2021 08:57, Jishnu Prakash wrote:
> Refactor code to support multiple generations of ADC_TM devices
> by defining gen number, irq name and disable, configure and isr
> APIs in the individual data structs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jishnu Prakash <quic_jprakash@...cinc.com>

Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>

Minor question below.

> ---
>   drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>   1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
> index 824671c..fc8cd45 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/qcom/qcom-spmi-adc-tm5.c
> @@ -78,11 +78,10 @@ enum adc5_timer_select {
>   	ADC5_TIMER_SEL_NONE,
>   };
>   
> -struct adc_tm5_data {
> -	const u32	full_scale_code_volt;
> -	unsigned int	*decimation;
> -	unsigned int	*hw_settle;
> -	bool		is_hc;
> +enum adc5_gen {
> +	ADC_TM5,
> +	ADC_TM_HC,
> +	ADC_TM5_MAX
>   };
>   
>   enum adc_tm5_cal_method {
> @@ -92,6 +91,18 @@ enum adc_tm5_cal_method {
>   };
>   
>   struct adc_tm5_chip;
> +struct adc_tm5_channel;
> +
> +struct adc_tm5_data {
> +	const u32 full_scale_code_volt;
> +	unsigned int *decimation;
> +	unsigned int *hw_settle;
> +	int (*disable_channel)(struct adc_tm5_channel *channel);
> +	int (*configure)(struct adc_tm5_channel *channel, int low, int high);
> +	irqreturn_t (*isr)(int irq, void *data);
> +	char *irq_name;
> +	int gen;
> +};

Any reason for moving the adc_tm5_data definition? It is still prefix 
with the adc_tmp5_channel declaration.

>   
>   /**
>    * struct adc_tm5_channel - ADC Thermal Monitoring channel data.
> @@ -139,22 +150,6 @@ struct adc_tm5_chip {
>   	u16			base;
>   };
>   
> -static const struct adc_tm5_data adc_tm5_data_pmic = {
> -	.full_scale_code_volt = 0x70e4,
> -	.decimation = (unsigned int []) { 250, 420, 840 },
> -	.hw_settle = (unsigned int []) { 15, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700,
> -					 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000, 32000,
> -					 64000, 128000 },
> -};
> -
> -static const struct adc_tm5_data adc_tm_hc_data_pmic = {
> -	.full_scale_code_volt = 0x70e4,
> -	.decimation = (unsigned int []) { 256, 512, 1024 },
> -	.hw_settle = (unsigned int []) { 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700,
> -					 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, 8000, 10000 },
> -	.is_hc = true,
> -};
> -
>   static int adc_tm5_read(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm, u16 offset, u8 *data, int len)
>   {
>   	return regmap_bulk_read(adc_tm->regmap, adc_tm->base + offset, data, len);
> @@ -343,14 +338,14 @@ static int adc_tm5_set_trips(void *data, int low, int high)
>   		channel->channel, low, high);
>   
>   	if (high == INT_MAX && low <= -INT_MAX)
> -		ret = adc_tm5_disable_channel(channel);
> +		ret = chip->data->disable_channel(channel);
>   	else
> -		ret = adc_tm5_configure(channel, low, high);
> +		ret = chip->data->configure(channel, low, high);
>   
>   	return ret;
>   }
>   
> -static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops adc_tm5_ops = {
> +static struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops adc_tm5_thermal_ops = {
>   	.get_temp = adc_tm5_get_temp,
>   	.set_trips = adc_tm5_set_trips,
>   };
> @@ -366,7 +361,7 @@ static int adc_tm5_register_tzd(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm)
>   		tzd = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(adc_tm->dev,
>   							   adc_tm->channels[i].channel,
>   							   &adc_tm->channels[i],
> -							   &adc_tm5_ops);
> +							   &adc_tm5_thermal_ops);
>   		if (IS_ERR(tzd)) {
>   			if (PTR_ERR(tzd) == -ENODEV) {
>   				dev_warn(adc_tm->dev, "thermal sensor on channel %d is not used\n",
> @@ -526,6 +521,31 @@ static int adc_tm5_get_dt_channel_data(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm,
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> +static const struct adc_tm5_data adc_tm5_data_pmic = {
> +	.full_scale_code_volt = 0x70e4,
> +	.decimation = (unsigned int []) { 250, 420, 840 },
> +	.hw_settle = (unsigned int []) { 15, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700,
> +					 1000, 2000, 4000, 8000, 16000, 32000,
> +					 64000, 128000 },
> +	.disable_channel = adc_tm5_disable_channel,
> +	.configure = adc_tm5_configure,
> +	.isr = adc_tm5_isr,
> +	.irq_name = "pm-adc-tm5",
> +	.gen = ADC_TM5,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct adc_tm5_data adc_tm_hc_data_pmic = {
> +	.full_scale_code_volt = 0x70e4,
> +	.decimation = (unsigned int []) { 256, 512, 1024 },
> +	.hw_settle = (unsigned int []) { 0, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700,
> +					 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000, 8000, 10000 },
> +	.disable_channel = adc_tm5_disable_channel,
> +	.configure = adc_tm5_configure,
> +	.isr = adc_tm5_isr,
> +	.irq_name = "pm-adc-tm5",
> +	.gen = ADC_TM_HC,
> +};
> +
>   static int adc_tm5_get_dt_data(struct adc_tm5_chip *adc_tm, struct device_node *node)
>   {
>   	struct adc_tm5_channel *channels;
> @@ -623,7 +643,7 @@ static int adc_tm5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		return ret;
>   	}
>   
> -	if (adc_tm->data->is_hc)
> +	if (adc_tm->data->gen == ADC_TM_HC)
>   		ret = adc_tm_hc_init(adc_tm);
>   	else
>   		ret = adc_tm5_init(adc_tm);
> @@ -638,8 +658,8 @@ static int adc_tm5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		return ret;
>   	}
>   
> -	return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, adc_tm5_isr,
> -					 IRQF_ONESHOT, "pm-adc-tm5", adc_tm);
> +	return devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL, adc_tm->data->isr,
> +			IRQF_ONESHOT, adc_tm->data->irq_name, adc_tm);
>   }
>   
>   static const struct of_device_id adc_tm5_match_table[] = {
> 


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ