lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211129162807.21966-1-wanghonglei@didichuxing.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Nov 2021 00:28:07 +0800
From:   Honglei Wang <wanghonglei@...ichuxing.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <jameshongleiwang@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: prevent cpu burst too many periods

Tasks might get more cpu than quota in persistent periods due to the
cpu burst introduced by commit f4183717b370 ("sched/fair: Introduce the
burstable CFS controller"). For example, one task group whose quota is
100ms per period and can get 100ms burst, and its avg utilization is
around 105ms per period. Once this group gets a free period which
leaves enough runtime, it has a chance to get computting power more
than its quota for 10 periods or more in common bandwidth configuration
(say, 100ms as period). It means tasks can 'steal' the bursted power to
do daily jobs because all tasks could be scheduled out or sleep to help
the group get free periods.

I believe the purpose of cpu burst is to help handling bursty worklod.
But if one task group can get computting power more than its quota for
persistent periods even there is no bursty workload, it's kinda broke.

This patch limits the burst to one period so that it won't break the
quota limit for long. With this, we can give task group more cpu burst
power to handle the real bursty workload and don't worry about the
'stealing'.

Signed-off-by: Honglei Wang <wanghonglei@...ichuxing.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6e476f6d9435..cc2c4567fc81 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -4640,14 +4640,17 @@ void __refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
 	if (unlikely(cfs_b->quota == RUNTIME_INF))
 		return;
 
-	cfs_b->runtime += cfs_b->quota;
-	runtime = cfs_b->runtime_snap - cfs_b->runtime;
+	runtime = cfs_b->runtime_snap - cfs_b->quota - cfs_b->runtime;
+
 	if (runtime > 0) {
 		cfs_b->burst_time += runtime;
 		cfs_b->nr_burst++;
+		cfs_b->runtime = cfs_b->quota;
+	} else {
+		cfs_b->runtime += cfs_b->quota;
+		cfs_b->runtime = min(cfs_b->runtime, cfs_b->quota + cfs_b->burst);
 	}
 
-	cfs_b->runtime = min(cfs_b->runtime, cfs_b->quota + cfs_b->burst);
 	cfs_b->runtime_snap = cfs_b->runtime;
 }
 
-- 
2.14.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ