linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] ARM: pxa/lubbock: Replace custom ->cs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 29 Nov 2021 16:45:59 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] ARM: pxa/lubbock: Replace custom ->cs_control() by GPIO lookup table

On Tue, 23 Nov 2021 21:27:21 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> SPI PXA2xx driver supports GPIO chipselect by querying for known
> GPIO connection ID. Replace custom ->cs_control() by GPIO table,
> so the driver will use generic approach on this platform.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/3] ARM: pxa/lubbock: Replace custom ->cs_control() by GPIO lookup table
      commit: 342e3ce0f6f4691b31b1c7c9c3ae37160c4a82d2
[2/3] spi: pxa2xx: Get rid of unused ->cs_control()
      commit: a9c8f68ce2c37ced2f7a8667eda71b7753ede398
[3/3] spi: pxa2xx: Get rid of unused enable_loopback member
      commit: 8393961c53b31078cfc877bc00eb0f67e1474edd

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark