[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211129181710.167817946@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:18:52 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 83/92] fuse: release pipe buf after last use
From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
commit 473441720c8616dfaf4451f9c7ea14f0eb5e5d65 upstream.
Checking buf->flags should be done before the pipe_buf_release() is called
on the pipe buffer, since releasing the buffer might modify the flags.
This is exactly what page_cache_pipe_buf_release() does, and which results
in the same VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page)) that the original patch was
trying to fix.
Reported-by: Justin Forbes <jmforbes@...uxtx.org>
Fixes: 712a951025c0 ("fuse: fix page stealing")
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # v2.6.35
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/fuse/dev.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/fuse/dev.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/dev.c
@@ -839,17 +839,17 @@ static int fuse_try_move_page(struct fus
goto out_put_old;
}
+ get_page(newpage);
+
+ if (!(buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LRU))
+ lru_cache_add_file(newpage);
+
/*
* Release while we have extra ref on stolen page. Otherwise
* anon_pipe_buf_release() might think the page can be reused.
*/
pipe_buf_release(cs->pipe, buf);
- get_page(newpage);
-
- if (!(buf->flags & PIPE_BUF_FLAG_LRU))
- lru_cache_add_file(newpage);
-
err = 0;
spin_lock(&cs->req->waitq.lock);
if (test_bit(FR_ABORTED, &cs->req->flags))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists