[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211130160654.1418231-10-stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:06:43 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Cc: zohar@...ux.ibm.com, serge@...lyn.com,
christian.brauner@...ntu.com, containers@...ts.linux.dev,
dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
krzysztof.struczynski@...wei.com, roberto.sassu@...wei.com,
mpeters@...hat.com, lhinds@...hat.com, lsturman@...hat.com,
puiterwi@...hat.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, jamjoom@...ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...l-moore.com, rgb@...hat.com,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, jmorris@...ei.org,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [RFC 09/20] ima: Only accept AUDIT rules for IMA non-init_ima_ns namespaces for now
Only accept AUDIT rules for non-init_ima_ns namespaces rejecting all rules
that require support for measuring, appraisal, and hashing.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 96e7d63167e8..02e96da2faff 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -1785,6 +1785,16 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(struct ima_namespace *ns,
result = -EINVAL;
break;
}
+
+ /* IMA namespace only accepts AUDIT rules */
+ if (ns != &init_ima_ns) {
+ switch (entry->action) {
+ case MEASURE:
+ case APPRAISE:
+ case HASH:
+ result = -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
}
if (!result && !ima_validate_rule(entry))
result = -EINVAL;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists