linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] gpiolib: allow to specify the firmware node in struct gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:55:19 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] gpiolib: allow to specify the firmware node in
 struct gpio_chip

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 06:19:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 06:14:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 04:41:23PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > Not sure I understand the proposal. Can you provide couple of (simplest)
> > examples?
> > 
> > And also it sounds like reinventing a wheel. What problem do you have that you
> > need to solve this way?
> 
> Have you seen these:
> 	drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> 	drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
> ?
> 
> GPIO driver has a main (controller level) node along with children on per bank
> basis. Currently it works with the provided approach (see second driver).

Btw, may be helpful to debug swnodes application
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210327222012.54103-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/#t

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko