[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEnQRZA7Nr+MMP7v+4T8G2y4L4HvSPVdoy4zekBFgynXJ16tCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 19:41:05 +0200
From: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....nxp.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>,
AjitKumar.Pandey@....com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Julian.Schroeder@....com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Balakishore.pati@....com,
YC Hung (洪堯俊) <yc.hung@...iatek.com>,
vishnuvardhanrao.ravulapati@....com, vsreddy@....com,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Bard Liao <bard.liao@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/21] ASoC: amd: Add module to determine ACP configuration
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 7:05 PM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:49:30AM -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> > To Geert's point, there may be an additional need to add a
>
> > depends on SND_SOC_AMD_ACP
>
> > There are also a set of
>
> > SND_SOC_AMD_ACPyx options, not sure if any applies as a dependency here?
>
> Or put them in an if block (IIRC I thought they were which was why the
> dependency wasn't needed but I don't know what I was looking at if I did
> check that).
There will be some delays in handling this as I'm in vacation until next Monday.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists