[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YaZ6cVidgo1e4h0g@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 16:24:33 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Paul A . Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf metric: Reduce multiplexing with duration_time
Em Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 07:11:36PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:46:31AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2021 at 8:23 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 05:52:26PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > It is common to use the same counters with and without
> > > > duration_time. The ID sharing code treats duration_time as if it
> > > > were a hardware event placed in the same group. This causes
> > > > unnecessary multiplexing such as in the following example where
> > > > l3_cache_access isn't shared:
> > > >
> > > > $ perf stat -M l3 -a sleep 1
> > > >
> > > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> > > >
> > > > 3,117,007 l3_cache_miss # 199.5 MB/s l3_rd_bw
> > > > # 43.6 % l3_hits
> > > > # 56.4 % l3_miss (50.00%)
> > > > 5,526,447 l3_cache_access (50.00%)
> > > > 5,392,435 l3_cache_access # 5389191.2 access/s l3_access_rate (50.00%)
> > > > 1,000,601,901 ns duration_time
> > > >
> > > > 1.000601901 seconds time elapsed
> > > >
> > > > Fix this by placing duration_time in all groups unless metric
> > > > sharing has been disabled on the command line:
> > > >
> > > > $ perf stat -M l3 -a sleep 1
> > > >
> > > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> > > >
> > > > 3,597,972 l3_cache_miss # 230.3 MB/s l3_rd_bw
> > > > # 48.0 % l3_hits
> > > > # 52.0 % l3_miss
> > > > 6,914,459 l3_cache_access # 6909935.9 access/s l3_access_rate
> > > > 1,000,654,579 ns duration_time
> > > >
> > > > 1.000654579 seconds time elapsed
> > > >
> > > > $ perf stat --metric-no-merge -M l3 -a sleep 1
> > > >
> > > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> > > >
> > > > 3,501,834 l3_cache_miss # 53.5 % l3_miss (24.99%)
> > > > 6,548,173 l3_cache_access (24.99%)
> > > > 3,417,622 l3_cache_miss # 45.7 % l3_hits (25.04%)
> > > > 6,294,062 l3_cache_access (25.04%)
> > > > 5,923,238 l3_cache_access # 5919688.1 access/s l3_access_rate (24.99%)
> > > > 1,000,599,683 ns duration_time
> > > > 3,607,486 l3_cache_miss # 230.9 MB/s l3_rd_bw (49.97%)
> > > >
> > > > 1.000599683 seconds time elapsed
> > > >
> > > > v2. Doesn't count duration_time in the metric_list_cmp function that
> > > > sorts larger metrics first. Without this a metric with duration_time
> > > > and an event is sorted the same as a metric with two events,
> > > > possibly not allowing the first metric to share with the second.
> > >
> > > hum, isn't the change about adding duration_time in every metric?
> > > or you could still end up with metric without duration_time
> >
> > It is about adding duration_time to all metrics. Sorting of the
> > metrics by number of IDs happens before we insert duration_time which
> > happens just prior to parsing. duration_time needn't be inserted if
> > --metric-no-merge is passed.
>
> I see, so that sorting takes place before it's added, makes sense then
>
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Thanks, applied.
- Arnaldo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists