[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YaamZW1nyOGDXfyw@piout.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 23:32:05 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Alexey Firago <alexey_firago@...tor.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, robh+dt@...nel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtc: max31343: Add a driver for Maxim MAX31343
Hello,
On 16/10/2021 22:21:17+0300, Alexey Firago wrote:
> +#define MAX31343_REG_TIMER_CFG (0x05)
> +#define TIMER_CFG_TFS GENMASK(1, 0) /* Timer frequency */
> +#define TIMER_CFG_TRPT BIT(2) /* Timer repeat mode */
> +#define TIMER_CFG_TPAUSE BIT(3) /* Timer Pause */
> +#define TIMER_CFG_TE BIT(4) /* Timer enable */
> +
> +/* RTC section */
> +#define MAX31343_REG_SEC (0x06)
> +#define SEC10_MASK GENMASK(6, 4) /* RTC seconds in multiples of 10 */
> +#define SEC_MASK GENMASK(3, 0) /* RTC seconds value */
I'm not convinced having separate masks is useful here, was that
automatically generated?
> +static int max31343_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
> +{
> + struct max31343_rtc_data *max31343 = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + u8 date[7];
> + int ret;
> +
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RTC set time %04d-%02d-%02d %02d/%02d/%02d\n",
> + tm->tm_year + 1900, tm->tm_mon, tm->tm_mday,
> + tm->tm_hour, tm->tm_min, tm->tm_sec);
> +
This could use %ptR
> + date[0] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_sec);
> + date[1] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_min);
> + date[2] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_hour);
> + date[3] = tm->tm_wday;
> + date[4] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_mday);
> + date[5] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_mon + 1);
> +
> + if (tm->tm_year >= 200)
> + date[5] |= CENTURY;
> + date[6] = bin2bcd(tm->tm_year % 100);
> +
> + ret = regmap_bulk_write(max31343->regmap, MAX31343_REG_SEC, date,
> + sizeof(date));
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
[...]
> +static int
> +max31343_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> +{
> + struct max31343_rtc_data *max31343 = NULL;
> + int ret, status;
> + struct nvmem_config nvmem_cfg = {
> + .name = "max31343_nvram",
> + .word_size = 1,
> + .stride = 1,
> + .size = MAX31343_RAM_SIZE,
> + .type = NVMEM_TYPE_BATTERY_BACKED,
> + .reg_read = max31343_nvram_read,
> + .reg_write = max31343_nvram_write,
> + };
> +
> + max31343 = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(struct max31343_rtc_data),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!max31343)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + max31343->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &max31343_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(max31343->regmap))
> + return PTR_ERR(max31343->regmap);
> +
> + i2c_set_clientdata(client, max31343);
> +
> + ret = regmap_read(max31343->regmap, MAX31343_REG_STATUS, &status);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + max31343->rtc = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&client->dev);
> + if (IS_ERR(max31343->rtc))
> + return PTR_ERR(max31343->rtc);
> +
> + max31343->rtc->range_min = RTC_TIMESTAMP_BEGIN_2000;
> + max31343->rtc->range_max = RTC_TIMESTAMP_END_2199;
For my information, did you check the time continuity in this interval?
> + max31343->rtc->ops = &max31343_rtc_ops;
> + ret = devm_rtc_register_device(max31343->rtc);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + nvmem_cfg.priv = max31343->regmap;
> + devm_rtc_nvmem_register(max31343->rtc, &nvmem_cfg);
> + max31343_hwmon_register(&client->dev);
The whole driver seems ok, I'd like to get a review from the hwmon
maintainers on the hwmon part as it is quite large.
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists