linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nvme: duplicate NQNs check if devices needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5f1be6d6-fa0d-8084-ccf1-7a3af6506046@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Nov 2021 13:04:55 +0800
From:   luanshi <zhangliguang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: duplicate NQNs check if devices needed

Hi Keith,

在 2021/11/30 0:34, Keith Busch 写道:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 07:18:54PM +0800, Liguang Zhang wrote:
>> @@ -2587,6 +2587,9 @@ static struct nvme_subsystem *__nvme_find_get_subsystem(const char *subsysnqn)
>>   
>>   	lockdep_assert_held(&nvme_subsystems_lock);
>>   
>> +	if (strncmp(subsysnqn, "nqn.", 4))
>> +		return NULL;
> This seems like an arbitrary way to decide not to check for duplicates.
> Shouldn't we just add the NVME_QUIRK_IGNORE_DEV_SUBNQN quirk for the
> broken controllers?

Yeah, add the NVME_QUIRK_IGNORE_DEV_SUBNQN quirk is a way to resolve the 
problem. I do not

have enough controller in my hand, I don't make sure all the controller 
are covered. And there are some

Weird devices from partners are not registered in pci id table:

https://pci-ids.ucw.cz/

"nqn." prefix is a required naming, so i used this way.


Thanks,

Liguang