[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6A743265-A298-435A-9D59-E3BDCFDCFD1D@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:36:15 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"Gairuboyina, Charishma1" <charishma1.gairuboyina@...el.com>,
"Dwarakanath, Kumar N" <kumar.n.dwarakanath@...el.com>,
"Krishnakumar, Lalithambika" <lalithambika.krishnakumar@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] x86: Support Key Locker
On Nov 29, 2021, at 19:27, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:06:45PM -0800, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>>
>> == Non Use Cases ==
>>
>> Bare metal disk encryption is the only use case intended by these patches.
>
> If that's the case, why are so many encryption modes being added (ECB, CTR, CBC,
> and XTS)? Wouldn't just XTS be sufficient?
Right, it would reduce the crypt library changes significantly. But it is
clueless whether XTS is sufficient to support DM-crypt, because a user may
select the kernel’s crypto API via ‘capi:', [1].
>> * PATCH10-15: For the x86 crypto library, it first prepares the AES-NI code
>> to accommodate the new AES implementation. Then incrementally add base
>> functions and various modes support -- ECB, CBC, CTR, and XTS. The code
>> was found to pass the crypto test.
>
> Did you test with CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER_EXTRA_TESTS=y?
Yes.
Thanks,
Chang
[1] https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/-/wikis/DMCrypt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists