| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20211130132137.GA25524@ranerica-svr.sc.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 05:21:37 -0800
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] thermal: intel: hfi: Handle CPU hotplug events
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 03:48:49PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 2:34 AM Ricardo Neri
> <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > All CPUs in a package are represented in an HFI table. There exists an
> > HFI table per package. Thus, CPUs in a package need to coordinate to
> > initialize and access the table. Do such coordination during CPU hotplug.
> > Use the first CPU to come online in a package to initialize the HFI table
> > and the data structure representing it. Other CPUs in the same package need
> > only to register or unregister themselves in that data structure.
> >
> > The HFI depends on both the package-level thermal management and the local
> > APIC thermal local vector. Thus, ensure that both are properly configured
> > before calling intel_hfi_online(). The CPU hotplug callbacks of the thermal
> > throttle events code already meet these conditions. Enable the HFI from
> > thermal_throttle_online().
> >
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c | 211 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.h | 4 +
> > drivers/thermal/intel/therm_throt.c | 8 ++
> > 3 files changed, 223 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c
> > index edfe343507b3..6a3adfd57d72 100644
> > --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/intel_hfi.c
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
> >
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "intel-hfi: " fmt
> >
> > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> >
> > #include "intel_hfi.h"
> > @@ -52,16 +53,26 @@ struct hfi_hdr {
> >
> > /**
> > * struct hfi_instance - Representation of an HFI instance (i.e., a table)
> > + * @table_base: Base of the local copy of the HFI table
> > * @ts_counter: Time stamp of the last update of the table
> > * @hdr: Base address of the table header
> > * @data: Base address of the table data
> > + * @die_id: Logical die ID this HFI table instance
> > + * @cpus: CPUs represented in this HFI table instance
> > + * @hw_table: Pointer to the HFI table of this instance
> > + * @initialized: True if this HFI instance has bee initialized
> > *
> > * A set of parameters to parse and navigate a specific HFI table.
> > */
> > struct hfi_instance {
> > + void *table_base;
> > u64 *ts_counter;
> > void *hdr;
> > void *data;
> > + u16 die_id;
> > + struct cpumask *cpus;
> > + void *hw_table;
> > + bool initialized;
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -83,10 +94,210 @@ struct hfi_features {
> > bool parsed;
> > };
> >
> > +/**
> > + * struct hfi_cpu_info - Per-CPU attributes to consume HFI data
> > + * @index: Row of this CPU in its HFI table
> > + * @hfi_instance: Attributes of the HFI table to which this CPU belongs
> > + *
> > + * Parameters to link a logical processor to an HFI table and a row within it.
> > + */
> > +struct hfi_cpu_info {
> > + s16 index;
> > + struct hfi_instance *hfi_instance;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hfi_cpu_info, hfi_cpu_info) = { .index = -1 };
> > +
> > static int max_hfi_instances;
> > static struct hfi_instance *hfi_instances;
> >
> > static struct hfi_features hfi_features;
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(hfi_lock);
> > +
> > +static void init_hfi_cpu_index(unsigned int cpu)
>
> I would make this function take a (struct hfi_cpu_info *) argument
> instead of the CPU number. It would be more concise then.
Sure Rafael, it would be more concise. I will make the change.
>
> > +{
> > + s16 hfi_idx;
> > + u32 edx;
> > +
> > + /* Do not re-read @cpu's index if it has already been initialized. */
> > + if (per_cpu(hfi_cpu_info, cpu).index > -1)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + edx = cpuid_edx(CPUID_HFI_LEAF);
> > + hfi_idx = (edx & CPUID_HFI_CPU_INDEX_MASK) >> CPUID_HFI_CPU_INDEX_SHIFT;
> > +
> > + per_cpu(hfi_cpu_info, cpu).index = hfi_idx;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * The format of the HFI table depends on the number of capabilities that the
> > + * hardware supports. Keep a data structure to navigate the table.
> > + */
> > +static void init_hfi_instance(struct hfi_instance *hfi_instance)
> > +{
> > + /* The HFI time-stamp is located at the base of the table. */
> > + hfi_instance->ts_counter = hfi_instance->table_base;
> > +
> > + /* The HFI header is below the time-stamp. */
> > + hfi_instance->hdr = hfi_instance->table_base +
> > + sizeof(*hfi_instance->ts_counter);
> > +
> > + /* The HFI data starts below the header. */
> > + hfi_instance->data = hfi_instance->hdr + hfi_features.hdr_size;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * intel_hfi_online() - Enable HFI on @cpu
> > + * @cpu: CPU in which the HFI will be enabled
> > + *
> > + * Enable the HFI to be used in @cpu. The HFI is enabled at the die/package
> > + * level. The first CPU in the die/package to come online does the full HFI
> > + * initialization. Subsequent CPUs will just link themselves to the HFI
> > + * instance of their die/package.
> > + */
> > +void intel_hfi_online(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct hfi_cpu_info *info = &per_cpu(hfi_cpu_info, cpu);
> > + u16 die_id = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> > + struct hfi_instance *hfi_instance;
> > + phys_addr_t hw_table_pa;
> > + u64 msr_val;
> > +
> > + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INTEL_HFI))
> > + return;
>
> IMO it is not useful to do anything below in this function if
> hfi_instances is NULL, so I would check it along with the above.
Indeed, there is no point on keep going it we didn't find memory for
hfi_instances. I will make the change.
> > +
> > + init_hfi_cpu_index(cpu);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The HFI instance of this @cpu may exist already but they have not
> > + * been linked to @cpu.
> > + */
> > + hfi_instance = info->hfi_instance;
> > + if (!hfi_instance) {
> > + if (!hfi_instances)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (die_id >= 0 && die_id < max_hfi_instances)
> > + hfi_instance = &hfi_instances[die_id];
> > +
> > + if (!hfi_instance)
> > + return;
>
> And here I would do
>
> if (die_id < 0 || die_id >= max_hfi_instances)
> return;
>
> hfi_instance = &hfi_instances[die_id];
>
> which is one branch less and fewer LOC.
>
Thanks Rafael, this looks better.
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Now check if the HFI instance of the package/die of this CPU has
> > + * been initialized. In such case, all we have to do is link @cpu's info
> > + * to the HFI instance of its die/package.
> > + */
> > + mutex_lock(&hfi_lock);
> > + if (hfi_instance->initialized) {
> > + info->hfi_instance = hfi_instance;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * @cpu is the first one in its die/package to come back online.
> > + * Use it to track the CPUs in the die/package.
> > + */
> > + if (!hfi_instance->cpus)
> > + hfi_instance->cpus = topology_core_cpumask(cpu);
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&hfi_lock);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Hardware is programmed with the physical address of the first page
> > + * frame of the table. Hence, the allocated memory must be page-aligned.
> > + */
> > + hfi_instance->hw_table = alloc_pages_exact(hfi_features.nr_table_pages,
> > + GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO);
> > + if (!hfi_instance->hw_table)
> > + goto err_out;
> > +
> > + hw_table_pa = virt_to_phys(hfi_instance->hw_table);
> > +
> > + hfi_instance->table_base = kzalloc(hfi_features.nr_table_pages << PAGE_SHIFT,
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!hfi_instance->table_base)
> > + goto free_hw_table;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Program the address of the feedback table of this die/package. On
> > + * some processors, hardware remembers the old address of the HFI table
> > + * even after having been reprogrammed and re-enabled. Thus, do not free
> > + * pages allocated for the table or reprogram the hardware with a new
> > + * base address. Namely, program the hardware only once.
> > + */
> > + msr_val = hw_table_pa | HFI_PTR_VALID_BIT;
> > + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_HW_FEEDBACK_PTR, msr_val);
> > +
> > + init_hfi_instance(hfi_instance);
> > +
> > + hfi_instance->die_id = die_id;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We can use the core cpumask of any cpu in the die/package. Any of
> > + * them will reflect all the CPUs the same package that are online.
> > + */
> > + hfi_instance->cpus = topology_core_cpumask(cpu);
> > + info->hfi_instance = hfi_instance;
> > + hfi_instance->initialized = true;
> > +
> > + mutex_unlock(&hfi_lock);
> > +
> > + return;
> > +
> > +free_hw_table:
> > + free_pages_exact(hfi_instance->hw_table, hfi_features.nr_table_pages);
> > +err_out:
> > + mutex_unlock(&hfi_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * intel_hfi_offline() - Disable HFI on @cpu
> > + * @cpu: CPU in which the HFI will be disabled
> > + *
> > + * Remove @cpu from those covered by its HFI instance.
> > + *
> > + * On some processors, hardware remembers previous programming settings even
> > + * after being reprogrammed. Thus, keep HFI enabled even if all CPUs in the
> > + * die/package of @cpu are offline. See note in intel_hfi_online().
> > + */
> > +void intel_hfi_offline(unsigned int cpu)
> > +{
> > + struct cpumask *die_cpumask = topology_core_cpumask(cpu);
> > + struct hfi_cpu_info *info = &per_cpu(hfi_cpu_info, cpu);
> > + struct hfi_instance *hfi_instance;
> > +
> > + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_INTEL_HFI))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + hfi_instance = info->hfi_instance;
> > + if (!hfi_instance)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (!hfi_instance->initialized)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&hfi_lock);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * We were using the core cpumask of @cpu to track CPUs in the same
> > + * die/package. Now it is going offline and we need to find another
> > + * CPU we can use.
> > + */
> > + if (die_cpumask == hfi_instance->cpus) {
> > + int new_cpu;
> > +
> > + new_cpu = cpumask_any_but(hfi_instance->cpus, cpu);
> > + if (new_cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
> > + /* All other CPUs in the package are offline. */
> > + hfi_instance->cpus = NULL;
> > + else
> > + hfi_instance->cpus = topology_core_cpumask(new_cpu);
>
> Hmmm. Is topology_core_cpumask() updated when CPUs go offline and online?
Yes. A CPU going offline is cleared from its siblings' cpumask [1] and its own [2]
in remove_siblinginfo() via cpu_disable_common(). A CPU going online is set
in its siblings' cpumask and its own in set_cpu_sibling_map() [3].
Thanks and BR,
Ricardo
[1]. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c?h=v5.16-rc3#n1592
[2]. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c?h=v5.16-rc3#n1617
[3]. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c?h=v5.16-rc3#n657
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists