lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:49:35 +0100
From:   Andrej Picej <andrej.picej@...ik.com>
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc:     support.opensource@...semi.com, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com,
        linux-imx@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mfd: da9062: make register CONFIG_I writable

Hi,

On 30. 11. 21 14:42, Andrej Picej wrote:
> From: Stefan Christ <s.christ@...tec.de>
> 
> Make the config register CONFIG_I writable to change the watchdog mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Christ <s.christ@...tec.de>
> Signed-off-by: Andrej Picej <andrej.picej@...ik.com>
> ---
>   drivers/mfd/da9062-core.c | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/da9062-core.c b/drivers/mfd/da9062-core.c
> index 01f8e10dfa55..7041ba53efb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/da9062-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/da9062-core.c
> @@ -556,6 +556,7 @@ static const struct regmap_range da9062_aa_writeable_ranges[] = {
>   	regmap_reg_range(DA9062AA_VBUCK3_B, DA9062AA_VBUCK3_B),
>   	regmap_reg_range(DA9062AA_VLDO1_B, DA9062AA_VLDO4_B),
>   	regmap_reg_range(DA9062AA_BBAT_CONT, DA9062AA_BBAT_CONT),
> +	regmap_reg_range(DA9062AA_CONFIG_I, DA9062AA_CONFIG_I),
>   	regmap_reg_range(DA9062AA_GP_ID_0, DA9062AA_GP_ID_19),
>   };
>   
> 

Changes in v2:
- no changes

sorry, just noticed I forgot to add what I changed for v2 patch series.
Should I resend the patches with that fixed/added? Should that be v3 
then or still v2?

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ