linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] tools/perf: Fix perf test 7 Simple expression parser

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YaY4HwSEJHszy64Y@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 Nov 2021 11:41:35 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        irogers@...gle.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
        sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tools/perf: Fix perf test 7 Simple expression parser

Em Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:23:39PM +0100, Thomas Richter escreveu:
> Some platforms do not have CPU die support, for example s390.
> Commit fdf1e29b6118 ("perf expr: Add metric literals for topology.")
> fails on s390:
>  # ./perf test -Fv 7
>    ...
>  # FAILED tests/expr.c:173 #num_dies >= #num_packages
>    ---- end ----
>    Simple expression parser: FAILED!
>  #
> 
> Investigating this issue leads to these functions:
>  build_cpu_topology()
>    +--> has_die_topology(void)
>         {
>            struct utsname uts;
> 
>            if (uname(&uts) < 0)
>                   return false;
>            if (strncmp(uts.machine, "x86_64", 6))
>                   return false;
>            ....
>         }
> 
> which always returns false on s390. The caller build_cpu_topology()
> checks has_die_topology() return value. On false the
> the struct cpu_topology::die_cpu_list is not contructed and has zero
> entries. This leads to the failing comparison: #num_dies >= #num_packages.
> s390 of course has a positive number of packages.
> 
> Fix this and check if the function build_cpu_topology() did build up
> a die_cpus_list. The number of entries in this list should be larger
> than 0. If the number of list element is zero, the die_cpus_list has
> not been created and the check in function test__expr()
>     TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies >= #num_packages", \
> 		    num_dies >= num_packages)
> always fails.
> 
> Output after:
>  # ./perf test -Fv 7
>   7: Simple expression parser                                        :
>   --- start ---
>   division by zero
>   syntax error
>   ---- end ----
>   Simple expression parser: Ok
>  #
> Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> Fixes: fdf1e29b6118 ("perf expr: Add metric literals for topology.")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/expr.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> index c895de481fe1..9356d90bf8db 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/expr.c
> @@ -169,7 +169,8 @@ static int test__expr(struct test_suite *t __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_u
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies", expr__parse(&num_dies, ctx, "#num_dies") == 0);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_cores >= #num_dies", num_cores >= num_dies);
>  	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_packages", expr__parse(&num_packages, ctx, "#num_packages") == 0);
> -	TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies >= #num_packages", num_dies >= num_packages);
> +	if (num_dies)
> +		TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies >= #num_packages", num_dies >= num_packages);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Source count returns the number of events aggregating in a leader
> -- 


I'll add a comment for the casual reader:

+	if (num_dies) // Some platforms do not have CPU die support, for example s390
+		TEST_ASSERT_VAL("#num_dies >= #num_packages", num_dies >= num_packages);