linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Fix a comment in cpufreq_policy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20211130151526.949-2-tangyizhou@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 30 Nov 2021 23:15:25 +0800
From:   Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@...wei.com>
To:     <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        <rafael@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Fix a comment in cpufreq_policy_free

The comment is inconsistent with the block_notifier_call_chain() call,
so fix it.

Signed-off-by: Tang Yizhou <tangyizhou@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index e338d2f010fe..8f753675e4a2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 	if (policy->max_freq_req) {
 		/*
-		 * CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY notification is sent only after
+		 * CPUFREQ_REMOVE_POLICY notification is sent only after
 		 * successfully adding max_freq_req request.
 		 */
 		blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
-- 
2.17.1