linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 67/68] io_uring: Fix undefined-behaviour in io_issue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211130144707.944580-67-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 30 Nov 2021 09:47:03 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 67/68] io_uring: Fix undefined-behaviour in io_issue_sqe

From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit f6223ff799666235a80d05f8137b73e5580077b9 ]

We got issue as follows:
================================================================================
UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in ./include/linux/ktime.h:42:14
signed integer overflow:
-4966321760114568020 * 1000000000 cannot be represented in type 'long long int'
CPU: 1 PID: 2186 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 4.19.90+ #12
Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0x0/0x3f0 arch/arm64/kernel/time.c:78
 show_stack+0x28/0x38 arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c:158
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x170/0x1dc lib/dump_stack.c:118
 ubsan_epilogue+0x18/0xb4 lib/ubsan.c:161
 handle_overflow+0x188/0x1dc lib/ubsan.c:192
 __ubsan_handle_mul_overflow+0x34/0x44 lib/ubsan.c:213
 ktime_set include/linux/ktime.h:42 [inline]
 timespec64_to_ktime include/linux/ktime.h:78 [inline]
 io_timeout fs/io_uring.c:5153 [inline]
 io_issue_sqe+0x42c8/0x4550 fs/io_uring.c:5599
 __io_queue_sqe+0x1b0/0xbc0 fs/io_uring.c:5988
 io_queue_sqe+0x1ac/0x248 fs/io_uring.c:6067
 io_submit_sqe fs/io_uring.c:6137 [inline]
 io_submit_sqes+0xed8/0x1c88 fs/io_uring.c:6331
 __do_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:8170 [inline]
 __se_sys_io_uring_enter fs/io_uring.c:8129 [inline]
 __arm64_sys_io_uring_enter+0x490/0x980 fs/io_uring.c:8129
 invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:53 [inline]
 el0_svc_common+0x374/0x570 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:121
 el0_svc_handler+0x190/0x260 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:190
 el0_svc+0x10/0x218 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:1017
================================================================================

As ktime_set only judge 'secs' if big than KTIME_SEC_MAX, but if we pass
negative value maybe lead to overflow.
To address this issue, we must check if 'sec' is negative.

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211118015907.844807-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/io_uring.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 365f8b350b7f0..d0933789bf3ce 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -6147,6 +6147,9 @@ static int io_timeout_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
 	if (get_timespec64(&data->ts, u64_to_user_ptr(sqe->addr)))
 		return -EFAULT;
 
+	if (data->ts.tv_sec < 0 || data->ts.tv_nsec < 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
 	data->mode = io_translate_timeout_mode(flags);
 	hrtimer_init(&data->timer, io_timeout_get_clock(data), data->mode);
 
-- 
2.33.0