| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMkAt6q9OsrZuEG-fXRh2D26F34RAZcX8KQS22CTLC7S+YF3MA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 11:17:36 -0700
From: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/12] KVM: SEV: Prohibit migration of a VM that has mirrors
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 5:50 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> VMs that mirror an encryption context rely on the owner to keep the
> ASID allocated. Performing a KVM_CAP_VM_MOVE_ENC_CONTEXT_FROM
> would cause a dangling ASID:
>
> 1. copy context from A to B (gets ref to A)
> 2. move context from A to L (moves ASID from A to L)
> 3. close L (releases ASID from L, B still references it)
>
> The right way to do the handoff instead is to create a fresh mirror VM
> on the destination first:
>
> 1. copy context from A to B (gets ref to A)
> [later] 2. close B (releases ref to A)
> 3. move context from A to L (moves ASID from A to L)
> 4. copy context from L to M
>
> So, catch the situation by adding a count of how many VMs are
> mirroring this one's encryption context.
>
> Fixes: 0b020f5af092 ("KVM: SEV: Add support for SEV-ES intra host migration")
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 22 ++++++++++-
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 1 +
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_migrate_tests.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 025d9731b66c..89a716290fac 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -1696,6 +1696,16 @@ int svm_vm_migrate_from(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int source_fd)
> }
>
> src_sev = &to_kvm_svm(source_kvm)->sev_info;
> +
> + /*
> + * VMs mirroring src's encryption context rely on it to keep the
> + * ASID allocated, but below we are clearing src_sev->asid.
> + */
> + if (src_sev->num_mirrored_vms) {
> + ret = -EBUSY;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> dst_sev->misc_cg = get_current_misc_cg();
> cg_cleanup_sev = dst_sev;
> if (dst_sev->misc_cg != src_sev->misc_cg) {
> @@ -1987,6 +1997,7 @@ int svm_vm_copy_asid_from(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int source_fd)
> */
> source_sev = &to_kvm_svm(source_kvm)->sev_info;
> kvm_get_kvm(source_kvm);
> + source_sev->num_mirrored_vms++;
>
> /* Set enc_context_owner and copy its encryption context over */
> mirror_sev = &to_kvm_svm(kvm)->sev_info;
> @@ -2019,12 +2030,21 @@ void sev_vm_destroy(struct kvm *kvm)
> struct list_head *head = &sev->regions_list;
> struct list_head *pos, *q;
>
> + WARN_ON(sev->num_mirrored_vms);
> +
If we don't change to atomic doesn't this need to happen when we have
the kvm->lock?
> if (!sev_guest(kvm))
> return;
>
> /* If this is a mirror_kvm release the enc_context_owner and skip sev cleanup */
> if (is_mirroring_enc_context(kvm)) {
> - kvm_put_kvm(sev->enc_context_owner);
> + struct kvm *owner_kvm = sev->enc_context_owner;
> + struct kvm_sev_info *owner_sev = &to_kvm_svm(owner_kvm)->sev_info;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&owner_kvm->lock);
> + if (!WARN_ON(!owner_sev->num_mirrored_vms))
> + owner_sev->num_mirrored_vms--;
> + mutex_unlock(&owner_kvm->lock);
> + kvm_put_kvm(owner_kvm);
> return;
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> index 5faad3dc10e2..1c7306c370fa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ struct kvm_sev_info {
> struct list_head regions_list; /* List of registered regions */
> u64 ap_jump_table; /* SEV-ES AP Jump Table address */
> struct kvm *enc_context_owner; /* Owner of copied encryption context */
> + unsigned long num_mirrored_vms; /* Number of VMs sharing this ASID */
> struct misc_cg *misc_cg; /* For misc cgroup accounting */
> atomic_t migration_in_progress;
> };
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_migrate_tests.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_migrate_tests.c
> index d265cea5de85..29b18d565cf4 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_migrate_tests.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sev_migrate_tests.c
> @@ -294,6 +294,41 @@ static void test_sev_mirror_parameters(void)
> kvm_vm_free(vm_no_vcpu);
> }
>
> +static void test_sev_move_copy(void)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vm *dst_vm, *sev_vm, *mirror_vm, *dst_mirror_vm;
> + int ret;
> +
> + sev_vm = sev_vm_create(/* es= */ false);
> + dst_vm = aux_vm_create(true);
> + mirror_vm = aux_vm_create(false);
> + dst_mirror_vm = aux_vm_create(false);
> +
> + sev_mirror_create(mirror_vm->fd, sev_vm->fd);
> + ret = __sev_migrate_from(dst_vm->fd, sev_vm->fd);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret == -1 && errno == EBUSY,
> + "Cannot migrate VM that has mirrors. ret %d, errno: %d\n", ret,
> + errno);
> +
> + /* The mirror itself can be migrated. */
> + sev_migrate_from(dst_mirror_vm->fd, mirror_vm->fd);
> + ret = __sev_migrate_from(dst_vm->fd, sev_vm->fd);
> + TEST_ASSERT(ret == -1 && errno == EBUSY,
> + "Cannot migrate VM that has mirrors. ret %d, errno: %d\n", ret,
> + errno);
> +
> + /*
> + * mirror_vm is not a mirror anymore, dst_mirror_vm is. Thus,
> + * the owner can be copied as soon as dst_mirror_vm is gone.
> + */
> + kvm_vm_free(dst_mirror_vm);
> + sev_migrate_from(dst_vm->fd, sev_vm->fd);
> +
> + kvm_vm_free(mirror_vm);
> + kvm_vm_free(dst_vm);
> + kvm_vm_free(sev_vm);
> +}
> +
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_MOVE_ENC_CONTEXT_FROM)) {
> @@ -301,6 +336,8 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> test_sev_migrate_from(/* es= */ true);
> test_sev_migrate_locking();
> test_sev_migrate_parameters();
> + if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_COPY_ENC_CONTEXT_FROM))
> + test_sev_move_copy();
> }
> if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_COPY_ENC_CONTEXT_FROM)) {
> test_sev_mirror(/* es= */ false);
> --
> 2.27.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists