| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <8f9b0c97-d7d8-9957-4525-391aaa27a9a2@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 00:07:51 +0530
From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@...inx.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
"Laurent Pinchart" <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>,
Bill Mills <bill.mills@...aro.org>,
"Sergei Korneichuk" <sergei.korneichuk@...inx.com>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] drivers: remoteproc: Add Xilinx r5 remoteproc
driver
On 12/1/21 1:44 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 at 01:01, Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@...inx.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/30/21 12:12 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:20:50PM -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>>>> This driver enables r5f dual core Real time Processing Unit subsystem
>>>> available on Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale MPSoC Platform. RPU subsystem
>>>> (cluster) can be configured in different modes e.g. split mode in which
>>>> two r5f cores work independent of each other and lock-step mode in which
>>>> both r5f cores execute same code clock-for-clock and notify if the
>>>> result is different.
>>>>
>>>> The Xilinx r5 Remoteproc Driver boots the RPU cores via calls to the Xilinx
>>>> Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access
>>>> and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this
>>>> driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@...inx.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 12 +
>>>> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
>>>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 959 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 972 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>>> ...and this patch gives me complation warnings:
>>>
>>> CC drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
>>> kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c: In function ‘add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode’:
>>> kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:412:28: warning: unused variable ‘cluster’ [-Wunused-variable]
>>> 412 | struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>>> | ^~~~~~~
>>> kernel-review/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c:411:26: warning: unused variable ‘parent_pdev’ [-Wunused-variable]
>>> 411 | struct platform_device *parent_pdev;
>>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~
>>>
>>> The above leads me to believe this patchset was not compiled before it was sent
>>> out.
>> Please don't assume that this patch-set was not compiled. This driver
>> was compiled and tested on Xilinx QEMU and zynqmp platform for its
>> functionality.
>>
>> This driver went through multiple internal reviews and I had to
>> re-architecture it multiple times.
> And yet two unused variables (which is pretty easy to spot) got by.
>
>> I simply missed to fix above warnings before submitting driver. I have
>> compiled driver with following command:
>>
>> //make ARCH=arm64 W=1 C=1 CROSS_COMPILE="aarch64-linux-gnu-" -j32 -Rr
>> O=$zynqmp_kernel_build/rproc-next
>>
>> I did my best to make sure driver stays warning free, however few
>> warnings were still missed. That is not intentional and by mistake. I
>> fully intend to comply with Linux Kernel community guideline and
>> checklist before submitting patches.
>>
> I am sure you do.
>
>> Apart from above warnings, two more warnings are there in v2 i.e. due to
>> typecast issue between (void __iomem *) and (void *). But, I had not
>> solution before. Also they were used before in different driver so, I
>> chose to use them anyway.
>>
> The sparse warnings related to the "__iomem *" can be ignored. I also
> tried to find a solution to those but realised it was more involved
> than expected.
>
>> I just found that using memremap set of functions will fix them. I will
>> use those functions in next patch set instead of ioremap_wc as explained
>> in this article: https://lwn.net/Articles/653585/
>>
> This is very interesting...
>
>>> Being new to this I can understand that checkpatch.pl was omitted (albeit amply
>>> documented) but obvious compilation warnings can't be excused. As such I
>>> am dropping this set and will not review another version until January.
>>
>> I understand having warnings in driver may lead to frustration and may
>> cause trust issues for the rest of the code and it can't be excused at all.
>>
> Very much so.
>
>> I am aware of guidelines of sending patches upstream
>> (https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html)
>> and fully intend to comply with that and like I said, if I miss
>> something it is not by intention but human error.
>>
>> I constantly try to improve processes to upstream patches so we don't
>> face above type of issues.
>>
>> I did run checkpatch.pl as per best of my knowledge and fixed lot of
>> style related warnings reported by it. Also I enabled W=1 option in my
>> compilation command and fixed lots of warnings reported by compiler too.
>> As I explained earlier, I wasn't aware of unused-variable warnings, and
>> so I missed to fix them.
>>
> Ok
>
>> With this, I request to review driver from functionality point of view
>> as well along with style errors. So, I can address more number of
>> comments / concerns in less number of patches. If you want these
>> warnings to be fixed, I will send v3 and you can put more comments on
>> v3. However, I highly appreciate if we can continue reviews and not
>> postpone till January. Please let me know your thoughts.
>>
> I will give this patchset another chance later this week.
Thanks for this consideration.
>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Tanmay
>>
>>
>>> Mathieu
>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>>>> index f30d00a3aabe..27f66910d8d3 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -315,6 +315,18 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
>>>> It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
>>>> a slave processor.
>>>>
>>>> +config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
>>>> + tristate "Xilinx R5 remoteproc support"
>>>> + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP
>>>> + depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE
>>>> + select RPMSG_VIRTIO
>>>> + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
>>>> + help
>>>> + Say y or m here to support Xilinx R5 remote processors via the remote
>>>> + processor framework.
>>>> +
>>>> + It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores.
>>>> +
>>>> endif # REMOTEPROC
>>>>
>>>> endmenu
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>>>> index bb26c9e4ef9c..334a8bed4c14 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>>>> @@ -35,3 +35,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 000000000000..c2167fd3869d
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,959 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
>>>> + *
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-message.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/skbuff.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +/* settings for RPU cluster mode */
>>>> +enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode {
>>>> + SPLIT_MODE = 0, // RPU cluster mode when cores run as separate processor
>>>> + LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1, // cores execute same code in lockstep,clk-for-clk
>>>> + SINGLE_CPU_MODE = 2, // core0 is held in reset and only core1 runs
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * struct mem_bank_data - Memory Bank description
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @addr: Start address of memory bank
>>>> + * @size: Size of Memory bank
>>>> + * @pm_domain_id: Power-domains id of memory bank for firmware to turn on/off
>>>> + * @bank_name: name of the bank for remoteproc framework
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct mem_bank_data {
>>>> + phys_addr_t addr;
>>>> + size_t size;
>>>> + enum pm_node_id pm_domain_id;
>>>> + char *bank_name;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = {
>>>> + {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
>>>> + {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"},
>>>> + {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"},
>>>> + {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"},
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * struct zynqmp_r5_core - ZynqMP R5 core structure
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @dev: device of RPU instance
>>>> + * @np: device node of RPU instance
>>>> + * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU
>>>> + * @tcm_banks: array of each TCM bank data
>>>> + * @res_mem_count: number of Reserved Memory regions per core
>>>> + * @res_mem: array of reserved memory regions
>>>> + * @rproc: rproc handle
>>>> + * @pm_domain_id: RPU CPU power domain id
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct zynqmp_r5_core {
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> + struct device_node *np;
>>>> + int tcm_bank_count;
>>>> + struct mem_bank_data *tcm_banks;
>>>> + int res_mem_count;
>>>> + struct reserved_mem *res_mem;
>>>> + struct rproc *rproc;
>>>> + enum pm_node_id pm_domain_id;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * struct zynqmp_r5_cluster - ZynqMP R5 cluster structure
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @dev: r5f subsystem cluster device node
>>>> + * @mode: cluster mode of type zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode
>>>> + * @core_count: number of r5 cores used for this cluster mode
>>>> + * @r5_cores: Array of r5 cores of type struct zynqmp_r5_core
>>>> + */
>>>> +struct zynqmp_r5_cluster {
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode mode;
>>>> + int core_count;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_cores;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode
>>>> + *
>>>> + * set RPU operation mode
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
>>>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode rpu_mode)
>>>> +{
>>>> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
>>>> + int ret, reg_val;
>>>> +
>>>> + reg_val = (rpu_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE ? 0 : 1);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, reg_val);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + pr_err("failed to set RPU mode\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + tcm_mode = (rpu_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) ?
>>>> + PM_RPU_TCM_COMB : PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
>>>> + if (ret < 0)
>>>> + pr_err("failed to configure TCM\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start
>>>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
>>>> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (!r5_core) {
>>>> + pr_err("can't get r5 core\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ?
>>>> + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr,
>>>> + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1,
>>>> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + pr_err("failed to start RPU = %d\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop
>>>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Power down R5 Core.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
>>>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + pr_err("failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret);
>>>> +
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map
>>>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>>>> + * @mem: mem entry to map
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
>>>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>>>> +{
>>>> + void __iomem *va;
>>>> +
>>>> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + mem->va = (void *)va;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
>>>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>>>> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Unmap memory-region carveout
>>>> + *
>>>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc,
>>>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>>>> +{
>>>> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * add_mem_regions
>>>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in
>>>> + * memory-region property
>>>> + *
>>>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int add_mem_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>>>> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core = rproc->priv;
>>>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->res_mem_count; i++) {
>>>> + rmem = &r5_core->res_mem[i];
>>>> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL,
>>>> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
>>>> + rmem->size, rmem->base,
>>>> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map,
>>>> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap,
>>>> + rmem->name);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mem))
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
>>>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>>>> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int tcm_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> + int i;
>>>> + enum pm_node_id pm_domain_id;
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core = rproc->priv;
>>>> + if (!r5_core) {
>>>> + pr_err("r5 core is not available\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) {
>>>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id;
>>>> + if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id))
>>>> + pr_warn("can't turn off TCM bank %d", pm_domain_id);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * tcm_mem_map
>>>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>>>> + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5
>>>> + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank
>>>> + * remoteproc carveout.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
>>>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>>>> +{
>>>> + void __iomem *va;
>>>> +
>>>> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Update memory entry va */
>>>> + mem->va = (void *)va;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* clear TCMs */
>>>> + memset_io(va, 0, mem->len);
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000,
>>>> + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give
>>>> + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000).
>>>> + */
>>>> + mem->da &= 0x000fffff;
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and
>>>> + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses
>>>> + * (0x0 and 0x20000).
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000)
>>>> + mem->da -= 0x90000;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */
>>>> + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) {
>>>> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "invalid TCM address: %x\n", mem->da);
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int i, num_banks, ret;
>>>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>>>> + enum pm_node_id pm_domain_id;
>>>> + u32 bank_addr;
>>>> + size_t bank_size = 0;
>>>> + char *bank_name;
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>>>> + if (!r5_core)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */
>>>> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
>>>> + if (num_banks <= 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
>>>> + bank_addr = (u32)r5_core->tcm_banks[i].addr;
>>>> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].bank_name;
>>>> + bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size;
>>>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
>>>> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
>>>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM %d", pm_domain_id);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%x, size=0x%lx",
>>>> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* add carveout */
>>>> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
>>>> + bank_size, bank_addr,
>>>> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
>>>> + bank_name);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mem)) {
>>>> + /* Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
>>>> + do {
>>>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id;
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node((u32)pm_domain_id);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + dev_warn(dev,
>>>> + "fail to release node: %x, %x\n",
>>>> + (u32)pm_domain_id, ret);
>>>> + } while (i--);
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int i, num_banks, ret;
>>>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>>>> + enum pm_node_id pm_domain_id;
>>>> + u32 bank_addr;
>>>> + size_t bank_size = 0;
>>>> + char *bank_name;
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> + struct platform_device *parent_pdev;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>>>> + if (!r5_core)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>>>> + if (!dev) {
>>>> + pr_err("r5 core device unavailable\n");
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /* go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */
>>>> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
>>>> + if (num_banks <= 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + bank_addr = (u32)r5_core->tcm_banks[0].addr;
>>>> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[0].bank_name;
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
>>>> + bank_size += r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size;
>>>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
>>>> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
>>>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM %d", pm_domain_id);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM add carveout lockstep mode %s addr=0x%x, size=0x%lx",
>>>> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* add carveout */
>>>> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
>>>> + bank_size, bank_addr,
>>>> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
>>>> + bank_name);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mem)) {
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
>>>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id;
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node((u32)pm_domain_id);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + dev_warn(dev,
>>>> + "fail to release node: %x ret: %x\n",
>>>> + (u32)pm_domain_id, ret);
>>>> + }
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * add_tcm_banks()
>>>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance
>>>> + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory
>>>> + * needed for firmware to be loaded
>>>> + *
>>>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> + struct platform_device *parent_pdev;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>>>> + if (!r5_core)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>>>> + if (!dev) {
>>>> + pr_err("r5 core device unavailable\n");
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + parent_pdev = to_platform_device(dev->parent);
>>>> + if (!parent_pdev) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "parent platform dev unavailable\n");
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + cluster = platform_get_drvdata(parent_pdev);
>>>> + if (!cluster) {
>>>> + dev_err(&parent_pdev->dev, "Invalid driver data\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (cluster->mode == SPLIT_MODE)
>>>> + return add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(rproc);
>>>> + else if (cluster->mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE)
>>>> + return add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(rproc);
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_err(cluster->dev, "invalid cluster mode\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw()
>>>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>>>> + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core
>>>> + *
>>>> + * When loading firmware, ensure the necessary carveouts are in remoteproc
>>>> + *
>>>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core = rproc->priv;
>>>> + if (!r5_core) {
>>>> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "r5 core not available\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = add_tcm_banks(rproc);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get TCM banks, err %d\n", ret);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = add_mem_regions(rproc);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get reserve mem regions %d\n", ret);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
>>>> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * resource table only required for IPC.
>>>> + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
>>>> + * for example, loading r5 hello world application
>>>> + * so simply inform user and keep going.
>>>> + */
>>>> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
>>>> + ret = 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
>>>> + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
>>>> + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
>>>> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
>>>> + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
>>>> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
>>>> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>>>> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static void zynqmp_r5_print_dt_node_info(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int i, j, k;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_dbg(cluster->dev, "Printing dt node info\n");
>>>> +
>>>> + pr_debug("cluster mode = %d\n", cluster->mode);
>>>> + pr_debug("r5f cluster in %s mode\n", (cluster->mode == 0) ? "SPLIT" :
>>>> + cluster->mode == 1 ? "LOCKSTEP" : "SINGLE_CPU");
>>>> + pr_debug("r5f num cores = %d\n", cluster->core_count);
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>>>> + r5_core = &cluster->r5_cores[i];
>>>> + if (!r5_core) {
>>>> + pr_err("can't get r5_core\n");
>>>> + continue;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + pr_debug("r5 core %d nodes\n", i);
>>>> + pr_debug("TCM banks = %d\n", r5_core->tcm_bank_count);
>>>> + for (k = 0; k < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; k++) {
>>>> + pr_debug("tcm %d addr=0x%llx size=0x%lx, pm_id=%d, %s\n",
>>>> + k, r5_core->tcm_banks[k].addr,
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[k].size,
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[k].pm_domain_id,
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[k].bank_name);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + pr_debug("reserve mem regions = %d\n", r5_core->res_mem_count);
>>>> +
>>>> + for (j = 0; j < r5_core->res_mem_count; j++) {
>>>> + pr_debug("mem %d addr=0x%llx, size=0x%llx, name=%s\n",
>>>> + j, r5_core->res_mem[j].base,
>>>> + r5_core->res_mem[j].size,
>>>> + r5_core->res_mem[j].name);
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/**
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core() - Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
>>>> + * this is called for each individual R5 core to
>>>> + * set up mailbox, Xilinx platform manager unique ID,
>>>> + * add to rproc core
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @r5_core: zynqmp_r5_core r5 core object to initialize
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> + struct rproc *r5_rproc;
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Set up DMA mask */
>>>> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
>>>> + r5_rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
>>>> + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r5_rproc))
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
>>>> + r5_rproc->priv = r5_core;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Add R5 remoteproc */
>>>> + ret = devm_rproc_add(dev, r5_rproc);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + pr_err("failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
>>>> + int i = 0, j;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> + const struct mem_bank_data *tcm = zynqmp_tcm_banks;
>>>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver until
>>>> + * system-dt spec is not final fot TCM
>>>> + */
>>>> + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* count per core tcm banks */
>>>> + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
>>>> +
>>>> + /* r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
>>>> + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
>>>> + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
>>>> + */
>>>> + tcm_node = 0;
>>>> + for (j = 0; j < cluster->core_count; j++) {
>>>> + r5_core = &cluster->r5_cores[j];
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct mem_bank_data) *
>>>> + tcm_bank_count, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r5_core->tcm_banks))
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < tcm_bank_count; i++) {
>>>> + /* Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
>>>> + * Eventually this should be replaced by values
>>>> + * parsed from dts.
>>>> + */
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].addr = tcm[tcm_node].addr;
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size = tcm[tcm_node].size;
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id = tcm[tcm_node].pm_domain_id;
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].bank_name = tcm[tcm_node].bank_name;
>>>> + tcm_node++;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int res_mem_count, i;
>>>> + struct device *dev;
>>>> + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
>>>> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
>>>> +
>>>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + np = r5_core->np;
>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(np)) {
>>>> + pr_err("invalid device node of r5 core\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
>>>> + sizeof(phandle));
>>>> + if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
>>>> + res_mem_count);
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core->res_mem = devm_kzalloc(dev,
>>>> + res_mem_count * sizeof(struct reserved_mem),
>>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (!r5_core->res_mem) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate mem region memory\n");
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
>>>> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
>>>> + if (!rmem_np)
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
>>>> + if (!rmem) {
>>>> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + memcpy(&r5_core->res_mem[i], rmem,
>>>> + sizeof(struct reserved_mem));
>>>> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_core->res_mem_count = res_mem_count;
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret, i;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>>>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>>>> + r5_core = &cluster->r5_cores[i];
>>>> + if (!r5_core) {
>>>> + pr_err("invalid r5 core\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
>>>> + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, cluster->mode);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(r5_core);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core %d\n", i);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>>>> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
>>>> + struct device_node *child;
>>>> + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
>>>> + int core_count = 0, ret, i;
>>>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_cores;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
>>>> + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (cluster_mode == SINGLE_CPU_MODE) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support single cpu mode\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + } else if ((cluster_mode != SPLIT_MODE &&
>>>> + cluster_mode != LOCKSTEP_MODE)) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid cluster mode\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
>>>> + if (core_count <= 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
>>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>>> + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
>>>> + core_count = 1;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_cores = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core) *
>>>> + core_count, GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r5_cores)) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "can't allocate memory for cores\n");
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + i = 0;
>>>> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
>>>> + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
>>>> + if (!child_pdev)
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_cores[i].dev = &child_pdev->dev;
>>>> + if (!r5_cores[i].dev) {
>>>> + pr_err("can't get device for r5 core %d\n", i);
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + r5_cores[i].np = dev_of_node(r5_cores[i].dev);
>>>> + if (!r5_cores[i].np) {
>>>> + pr_err("can't get device node for r5 core %d\n", i);
>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + i++;
>>>> + if (i == core_count)
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
>>>> + cluster->core_count = core_count;
>>>> + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + zynqmp_r5_print_dt_node_info(cluster);
>>>> +
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
>>>> +
>>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>>>> +
>>>> + pr_info("Exit r5f subsystem driver\n");
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
>>>> + *
>>>> + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
>>>> + *
>>>> + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
>>>> + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> + int ret;
>>>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cluster))
>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +
>>>> + cluster->dev = dev;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to populate platform dev %d\n", ret);
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
>>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
>>>> + return ret;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + dev_info(dev, "Xilinx r5f remoteproc driver probe success\n");
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
>>>> +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
>>>> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
>>>> + { /* end of list */ },
>>>> +};
>>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
>>>> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
>>>> + .driver = {
>>>> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
>>>> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
>>>> + },
>>>> +};
>>>> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
>>>> +
>>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
>>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
>>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists