lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yaf318q5CcqLMCK6@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Dec 2021 14:31:51 -0800
From:   Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Peter Chen <peter.chen@...nel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
        Ravi Chandra Sadineni <ravisadineni@...omium.org>,
        Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 2/7] of/platform: Add stubs for
 of_platform_device_create/destroy()

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 09:43:57AM -0800, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 12:07:34PM -0800, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > Code for platform_device_create() and of_platform_device_destroy() is
> > only generated if CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS=y. Add stubs to avoid unresolved
> > symbols when CONFIG_OF_ADDRESS is not set.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> 
> Is anything preventing this patch from landing? It has Rob's ack and is
> an improvement regardless of the fate of the rest of the series it is
> part of. The patch was carried around unchanged in the last 10 versions
> of the series, it would be nice if it could just get landed instead of
> keep carrying it around :)

ping

Rob/Frank: is there any reason why this patch can't be landed?

Thanks

Matthias

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ