linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: dwapb: clarify usage of the register file version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MfC0wwa+T40eqUTx5w_X6ioqDbL3a7nnOTogpE2j4HVOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Dec 2021 09:29:54 +0100
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hoan Tran <hoan@...amperecomputing.com>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: dwapb: clarify usage of the register file version

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:50 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> First of all, it's obvious that different versions can't be provided
> simultaneously. Hence, versions can't be bit masks.
>
> Second, due to above we have to mask out the version field in the flags
> and only that can be evaluated against the certain version.
>
> Clarify all above by:
>  - introducing GPIO_REG_OFFSET_V1 and GPIO_REG_OFFSET_MASK
>  - replacing conditional to mask out bits and compare to a version
>
> Luckily there is no functional change (at least intended), so no need
> to backport this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> index f98fa33e1679..ec0767d7800d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,9 @@
>  #define GPIO_SWPORT_DR_STRIDE  0x0c /* register stride 3*32 bits */
>  #define GPIO_SWPORT_DDR_STRIDE 0x0c /* register stride 3*32 bits */
>
> +#define GPIO_REG_OFFSET_V1     0
>  #define GPIO_REG_OFFSET_V2     1
> +#define GPIO_REG_OFFSET_MASK   BIT(0)
>
>  #define GPIO_INTMASK_V2                0x44
>  #define GPIO_INTTYPE_LEVEL_V2  0x34
> @@ -141,7 +143,7 @@ static inline u32 gpio_reg_v2_convert(unsigned int offset)
>
>  static inline u32 gpio_reg_convert(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio, unsigned int offset)
>  {
> -       if (gpio->flags & GPIO_REG_OFFSET_V2)
> +       if ((gpio->flags & GPIO_REG_OFFSET_MASK) == GPIO_REG_OFFSET_V2)
>                 return gpio_reg_v2_convert(offset);
>
>         return offset;
> @@ -668,15 +670,15 @@ static int dwapb_get_clks(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio)
>  }
>
>  static const struct of_device_id dwapb_of_match[] = {
> -       { .compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio", .data = (void *)0},
> +       { .compatible = "snps,dw-apb-gpio", .data = (void *)GPIO_REG_OFFSET_V1},
>         { .compatible = "apm,xgene-gpio-v2", .data = (void *)GPIO_REG_OFFSET_V2},
>         { /* Sentinel */ }
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, dwapb_of_match);
>
>  static const struct acpi_device_id dwapb_acpi_match[] = {
> -       {"HISI0181", 0},
> -       {"APMC0D07", 0},
> +       {"HISI0181", GPIO_REG_OFFSET_V1},
> +       {"APMC0D07", GPIO_REG_OFFSET_V1},
>         {"APMC0D81", GPIO_REG_OFFSET_V2},
>         { }
>  };
> --
> 2.33.0
>

Reviewed-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>

Please send it with your PR.

Bart