lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211201084927.GB26222@axis.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Dec 2021 09:49:27 +0100
From:   Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
To:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
CC:     Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, kernel <kernel@...s.com>,
        "linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: pcf8523: fix alarm interrupt disabling

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 12:19:12AM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 03/11/2021 16:22:52+0100, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> > Fix the driver to actually disable the IRQ and not overwrite other bits
> > in the CONTROL_1 register when it is asked to disable the alarm
> > interrupt.
> > 
> > Compile-tested only.
> > 
> > Fixes: 13e37b7fb75dfaeb4 ("rtc: pcf8523: add alarm support")
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@...s.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c
> > index 8b6fb20774bf..e26477267451 100644
> > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c
> > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c
> > @@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int pcf8523_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
> >  	if (err < 0)
> >  		return err;
> >  
> > -	value &= PCF8523_CONTROL1_AIE;
> > +	value &= ~PCF8523_CONTROL1_AIE;
> >  
> 
> I was going to apply that but it seems this was fixed by:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit?id=91f3849d956d58073ef55e01f2e8871dc30847a5

Yes, you're right, sorry.  I had only checked mainline at the time I
wrote the patch and not what was queued up in linux-next.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ