[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211201093321.31312-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 17:33:21 +0800
From: <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
To: <zhou1615@....edu>
CC: <kjlu@....edu>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<miles.chen@...iatek.com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
<sboyd@...nel.org>, <wendell.lin@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: mt6779: Fix a NULL pointer dereference in clk_mt6779_top_probe()
Hi Qingyang,
> Fix this bug by adding a check of clk_data.
>
> Another way to fix this bug is to add a check of clk_data in
> mtk_clk_register_muxes(), which may solve many similar bugs but could
> cause potential problems to previously correct cases as the API is changed.
>
> This bug was found by a static analyzer. The analysis employs
> differential checking to identify inconsistent security operations
> (e.g., checks or kfrees) between two code paths and confirms that the
> inconsistent operations are not recovered in the current function or
> the callers, so they constitute bugs.
>
> Note that, as a bug found by static analysis, it can be a false
> positive or hard to trigger. Multiple researchers have cross-reviewed
> the bug.
>
> Builds with CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_MT6779=y show no new warnings,
> and our static analyzer no longer warns about this code.
>
> Fixes: 710774e04861 ("clk: mediatek: Add MT6779 clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Qingyang <zhou1615@....edu>
>
thanks,
Reviewed-by: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists