linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: designware-pci: Add support for Fast Mode Plus and High Speed Mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB366003BA82D2A65F60D3AF4BC4689@DM6PR11MB3660.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 1 Dec 2021 09:39:31 +0000
From:   "D, Lakshmi Sowjanya" <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@...el.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Senthil, Bala" <bala.senthil@...el.com>,
        "N, Pandith" <pandith.n@...el.com>,
        "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Saha, Tamal" <tamal.saha@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: designware-pci: Add support for Fast Mode
 Plus and High Speed Mode



>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
>Sent: Wednesday, December 1, 2021 2:07 PM
>To: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
>Cc: D, Lakshmi Sowjanya <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@...el.com>; linux-
>i2c@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Senthil, Bala
><bala.senthil@...el.com>; N, Pandith <pandith.n@...el.com>; Andy
>Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>; Saha, Tamal
><tamal.saha@...el.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] i2c: designware-pci: Add support for Fast Mode
>Plus and High Speed Mode
>
>
>> See the comments from Andy. Recent enough Elkhart Lake BIOS and his
>> patches from last year already provide the timing parameters. Feeling
>> embarrassed I forgot them :-(
>
>But the u16 conversion of the existing parameters is still useful?

Jarkko: I've seen the changes by Andy. These patches are no more required as suggested. I'm following up on the same, regarding ACPI table entries.

I have the same query...is the u16 conversion of existing parameters still useful?

Regards
Lakshmi Sowjanya D