[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2c23335e98bc4a66b1fd779a78ddd821@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 09:50:57 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Brian Gerst' <brgerst@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/6] x86-64: Convert stack protector to normal percpu
variable
From: Brian Gerst
> Sent: 30 November 2021 20:56
>
> Older versions of GCC fixed the location of the stack protector canary
> at %gs:40. This constraint forced the percpu section to be linked at
> virtual address 0 so that the canary could be the first data object in
> the percpu section. Supporting the zero-based percpu section requires
> additional code to handle relocations for RIP-relative references to
> percpu data, extra complexity to kallsyms, and workarounds for linker
> bugs due to the use of absolute symbols.
>
> Since version 8.1, GCC has options to configure the location of the
> canary value. This allows the canary to be turned into a normal
> percpu variable and removes the constraint that the percpu section
> be zero-based.
I didn't think the minimum gcc version has been raised as far as 8.1?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists