[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878rx4a9p3.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 11:41:44 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>, Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
rui.zhang@...el.com, andi.kleen@...el.com,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, tim.c.chen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/tsc: skip tsc watchdog checking for
qualified platforms
Luming,
please trim your replies.
On Tue, Nov 30 2021 at 23:45, Luming Yu wrote:
> We do need to decouple tsc from HPET as the current HPET as a
> clocksource watchdog for tsc is only useful to find HPET read skews in
> some circumstances and the variations of HPET read come from many
> different sources. But none of which really came from the tsc quality,
> AFAICT.
Sorry, but I fail to decode this sentence.
> so this patch is in line with my understanding of the problem.
> So , please use reviewed-by : luming.yu@...el.com , if it can help
> the merge of the patch. : -)
Please send Reviewed-by as a properly formatted single line tag:
Reviewed-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@...el.com>
so it can be picked up by tools automatically. Mangling it into a
sentence just creates extra work for maintainers.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists