[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vd8PFhs8_Ji5x1X2Ph5ey+8JrRuneWCrG=5a+52Lh-ptQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 12:54:19 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Jaewon Kim <jaewon02.kim@...sung.com>,
Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
David Virag <virag.david003@...il.com>,
Youngmin Nam <youngmin.nam@...sung.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 3/5] tty: serial: samsung: Remove USI initialization
On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 12:42 AM Sam Protsenko
<semen.protsenko@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> USI control is now extracted to dedicated USI driver. Remove USI related
the dedicated
> code from serial driver to avoid conflicts and code duplication.
Would it break run-time bisectability?
If so, why is it not a problem?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists