linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] gpiolib: allow to specify the firmware node in struct gpio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:54:56 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] gpiolib: allow to specify the firmware node in
 struct gpio_chip

On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 03:36:29PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 3:34 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:28:19PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:53:42PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 2:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:11:28PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 10:04 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl> wrote:

> > > > Drop this patch and drop the line where the fwnode is assigned in
> > > > gpio-sim.c. Then probe the device and print the addresses of the
> > > > parent and child swnodes. See how they are the same and don't match
> > > > the swnode hierarchy we created. You can then apply this patch and see
> > > > how it becomes correct.
> > >
> > > Thanks. I will give a spin.
> > >
> > > Note, it seems I have to revert your older code first...
> >
> > Okay, I have to postpone because simple revert doesn't work for me.
> > Can you clean up the next, please and I can use it starting from tomorrow?
> >
> >
> > $ git tag --contains 5065e08e4ef3
> > DONT-USE-next-20211105
> > next-20211101
> > next-20211102
> > next-20211103
> > next-20211104
> > next-20211105
> > next-20211106
> > next-20211108
> > next-20211109
> > next-20211110
> > next-20211111
> > next-20211112
> > next-20211115
> > next-20211116
> > next-20211117
> > next-20211118
> > next-20211123
> > next-20211124
> > next-20211125
> > next-20211126
> > next-20211129
> > next-20211130
> > next-20211201

> None of this is in next, please use:
> https://github.com/brgl/linux/tree/topic/gpio-sim-v12 if you want a
> branch.

It the old version that prevents me to apply (my branches based on next).

> I just thought you were going to simply apply these patches.

That's correct, but see above.

Anyway, I'm already switched tasks for today. Maybe I will have some time
later on.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko