linux-kernel - [PATCH 05/11] mm/damon/vaddr-test: Split a test function having >1024 bytes frame size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211201150440.1088-6-sj@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed,  1 Dec 2021 15:04:34 +0000
From:   SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     shuah@...nel.org, brendanhiggins@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/11] mm/damon/vaddr-test: Split a test function having >1024 bytes frame size

On some configuration[1], 'damon_test_split_evenly()' kunit test
function has >1024 bytes frame size, so below build warning is
triggered:

      CC      mm/damon/vaddr.o
    In file included from mm/damon/vaddr.c:672:
    mm/damon/vaddr-test.h: In function 'damon_test_split_evenly':
    mm/damon/vaddr-test.h:309:1: warning: the frame size of 1064 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
      309 | }
          | ^

This commit fixes the warning by separating the common logics in the
function.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/202111182146.OV3C4uGr-lkp@intel.com/

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Fixes: 17ccae8bb5c9 ("mm/damon: add kunit tests")
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
---
 mm/damon/vaddr-test.h | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
index ecfd0b2ed222..3097ef9c662a 100644
--- a/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
+++ b/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
@@ -252,59 +252,62 @@ static void damon_test_apply_three_regions4(struct kunit *test)
 			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
 }
 
-static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
+static void damon_test_split_evenly_fail(struct kunit *test,
+		unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
 {
-	struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx();
-	struct damon_target *t;
-	struct damon_region *r;
-	unsigned long i;
-
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
-			-EINVAL);
-
-	t = damon_new_target(42);
-	r = damon_new_region(0, 100);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 0), -EINVAL);
+	struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(42);
+	struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
 
 	damon_add_region(r, t);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 10), 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 10u);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), -EINVAL);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);
 
-	i = 0;
 	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, i++ * 10);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, i * 10);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
 	}
+
 	damon_free_target(t);
+}
+
+static void damon_test_split_evenly_succ(struct kunit *test,
+	unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
+{
+	struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target(42);
+	struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
+	unsigned long expected_width = (end - start) / nr_pieces;
+	unsigned long i = 0;
 
-	t = damon_new_target(42);
-	r = damon_new_region(5, 59);
 	damon_add_region(r, t);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 5), 0);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 5u);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+			damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), 0);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), nr_pieces);
 
-	i = 0;
 	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
-		if (i == 4)
+		if (i == nr_pieces - 1)
 			break;
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i++);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 5 + 10 * i);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
+				r->ar.start, start + i++ * expected_width);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, start + i * expected_width);
 	}
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5 + 10 * i);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 59ul);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start + i * expected_width);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
 	damon_free_target(t);
+}
 
-	t = damon_new_target(42);
-	r = damon_new_region(5, 6);
-	damon_add_region(r, t);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, 2), -EINVAL);
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);
+static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct damon_ctx *c = damon_new_ctx();
+
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
+			-EINVAL);
+
+	damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 0, 100, 0);
+	damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 100, 10);
+	damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 5, 59, 5);
+	damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 5, 6, 2);
 
-	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, 5ul);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, 6ul);
-	}
-	damon_free_target(t);
 	damon_destroy_ctx(c);
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1