[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77fca7d2-b1d8-fe11-322a-3d32f40f6f65@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:15:48 +0100
From: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>
To: Zhou Qingyang <zhou1615@....edu>
Cc: kjlu@....edu, Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/radeon/radeon_kms: Fix a NULL pointer dereference
in radeon_driver_open_kms()
Am 01.12.21 um 16:13 schrieb Zhou Qingyang:
> In radeon_driver_open_kms(), radeon_vm_bo_add() is assigned to
> vm->ib_bo_va and passes and used in radeon_vm_bo_set_addr(). In
> radeon_vm_bo_set_addr(), there is a dereference of vm->ib_bo_va,
> which could lead to a NULL pointer dereference on failure of
> radeon_vm_bo_add().
>
> Fix this bug by adding a check of vm->ib_bo_va.
>
> This bug was found by a static analyzer. The analysis employs
> differential checking to identify inconsistent security operations
> (e.g., checks or kfrees) between two code paths and confirms that the
> inconsistent operations are not recovered in the current function or
> the callers, so they constitute bugs.
>
> Note that, as a bug found by static analysis, it can be a false
> positive or hard to trigger. Multiple researchers have cross-reviewed
> the bug.
>
> Builds with CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=m show no new warnings,
> and our static analyzer no longer warns about this code.
>
> Fixes: cc9e67e3d700 ("drm/radeon: fix VM IB handling")
> Signed-off-by: Zhou Qingyang <zhou1615@....edu>
> ---
> Changes in v5:
> - Use conditions to avoid unnecessary initialization
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Initialize the variables to silence warning
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix the bug that good case will also be freed
> - Improve code style
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Improve the error handling into goto style
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> index 482fb0ae6cb5..66aee48fd09d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_kms.c
> @@ -648,6 +648,8 @@ void radeon_driver_lastclose_kms(struct drm_device *dev)
> int radeon_driver_open_kms(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
> {
> struct radeon_device *rdev = dev->dev_private;
> + struct radeon_fpriv *fpriv;
> + struct radeon_vm *vm;
> int r;
>
> file_priv->driver_priv = NULL;
> @@ -660,8 +662,6 @@ int radeon_driver_open_kms(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
>
> /* new gpu have virtual address space support */
> if (rdev->family >= CHIP_CAYMAN) {
> - struct radeon_fpriv *fpriv;
> - struct radeon_vm *vm;
>
> fpriv = kzalloc(sizeof(*fpriv), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (unlikely(!fpriv)) {
> @@ -672,35 +672,39 @@ int radeon_driver_open_kms(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv)
> if (rdev->accel_working) {
> vm = &fpriv->vm;
> r = radeon_vm_init(rdev, vm);
> - if (r) {
> - kfree(fpriv);
> - goto out_suspend;
> - }
> + if (r)
> + goto out_fpriv;
>
> r = radeon_bo_reserve(rdev->ring_tmp_bo.bo, false);
> - if (r) {
> - radeon_vm_fini(rdev, vm);
> - kfree(fpriv);
> - goto out_suspend;
> - }
> + if (r)
> + goto out_vm_fini;
>
> /* map the ib pool buffer read only into
> * virtual address space */
> vm->ib_bo_va = radeon_vm_bo_add(rdev, vm,
> rdev->ring_tmp_bo.bo);
> + if (!vm->ib_bo_va) {
> + r = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_vm_fini;
> + }
> +
> r = radeon_vm_bo_set_addr(rdev, vm->ib_bo_va,
> RADEON_VA_IB_OFFSET,
> RADEON_VM_PAGE_READABLE |
> RADEON_VM_PAGE_SNOOPED);
> - if (r) {
> - radeon_vm_fini(rdev, vm);
> - kfree(fpriv);
> - goto out_suspend;
> - }
> + if (r)
> + goto out_vm_fini;
> }
> file_priv->driver_priv = fpriv;
> }
>
> + if (!r)
I think that test is unecessary now, maybe double check.
Either way patch Reviewed-by: Christian König
<christian.koenig@....com>. Alex will probably pick it up now.
Thanks for the help,
Christian.
> + goto out_suspend;
> +
> +out_vm_fini:
> + radeon_vm_fini(rdev, vm);
> +out_fpriv:
> + kfree(fpriv);
> out_suspend:
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev->dev);
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev->dev);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists