linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: snmp: add statistics for tcp small queue check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 1 Dec 2021 10:05:05 +0800
From:   Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        dsahern@...nel.org, Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>, kuniyu@...zon.co.jp,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] net: snmp: add statistics for tcp small queue check

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:56 PM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 7:23 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 30 Nov 2021 22:36:59 +0800 Menglong Dong wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 11:57 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 14:01:02 +0800 menglong8.dong@...il.com wrote:
> > > > > Once tcp small queue check failed in tcp_small_queue_check(), the
> > > > > throughput of tcp will be limited, and it's hard to distinguish
> > > > > whether it is out of tcp congestion control.
> > > > >
> > > > > Add statistics of LINUX_MIB_TCPSMALLQUEUEFAILURE for this scene.
> > > >
> > > > Isn't this going to trigger all the time and alarm users because of the
> > > > "Failure" in the TCPSmallQueueFailure name?  Isn't it perfectly fine
> > > > for TCP to bake full TSQ amount of data and have it paced out onto the
> > > > wire? What's your link speed?
> > >
> > > Well, it's a little complex. In my case, there is a guest in kvm, and virtio_net
> > > is used with napi_tx enabled.
> > >
> > > With napi_tx enabled, skb won't be orphaned after it is passed to virtio_net,
> > > until it is released. The point is that the sending interrupt of
> > > virtio_net will be
> > > turned off and the skb can't be released until the next net_rx interrupt comes.
> > > So, wmem_alloc can't decrease on time, and the bandwidth is limited. When
> > > this happens, the bandwidth can decrease from 500M to 10M.
> > >
> > > In fact, this issue of uapi_tx is fixed in this commit:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210719144949.935298466@linuxfoundation.org/
> > >
> > > I added this statistics to monitor the sending failure (may be called
> > > sending delay)
> > > caused by qdisc and net_device. When something happen, maybe users can
> > > raise ‘/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_pacing_ss_ratio’ to get better bandwidth.
> >
> > Sounds very second-order and particular to a buggy driver :/
> > Let's see what Eric says but I vote revert.
>
> I did some tests yesterday, using one high speed TCP_STREAM (~90Gbit),
> and got plenty of increments when using pfifo_fast qdisc.
> Yet seed was nominal (bottleneck is the copyout() cost at receiver)
>
> I got few counter increments when qdisc is fq as expected
> (because of commit c73e5807e4f6fc6d "tcp: tsq: no longer use
> limit_output_bytes for paced flows")
>
>
> So this new SNMP counter is not a proxy for the kind of problems that a buggy
> driver would trigger.
>
> I also suggest we revert this patch.

Seems this SNMP is indeed not suitable....I vote to revert too.

（Seems Jakub already do the revert, thanks~)

In fact, I'm a little curious that this patch is applied directly. I
used to receive
emails with the message 'applied'.

>
> Thanks !