[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ec6b0b3-0d59-ff68-13b3-c9798f3ac6c6@vt.edu>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 10:22:21 -0500
From: Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
corbet@....net, rdunlap@...radead.org, mchehab+huawei@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] include: linux: Reorganize timekeeping and ktime
headers
On 11/16/21 5:11 PM, Carlos Bilbao wrote:
> Reorganize and separate the headers by making ktime.h take care of the
> ktime_get() family of functions, and reserve timekeeping.h for the actual
> timekeeping. This also helps to avoid implicit function errors and strengthens
> the header dependencies, since timekeeping.h was using ktime_to_ns(), a static
> function defined in a header it does no include, ktime.h. Include the header
> timekeeping.h wherever it is necessary for a successful compilation after the
> header code reorganization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Carlos Bilbao <bilbao@...edu>
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> ---
Someone, look at me! What a lonely and solitary patch I am...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists