[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e86c2c7-eb84-4170-00f2-007bed67f93a@mojatatu.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:26:03 -0500
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Volodymyr Mytnyk <volodymyr.mytnyk@...ision.eu>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Taras Chornyi <taras.chornyi@...ision.eu>,
Mickey Rachamim <mickeyr@...vell.com>,
Serhiy Pshyk <serhiy.pshyk@...ision.eu>,
Volodymyr Mytnyk <vmytnyk@...vell.com>,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: prestera: flower template support
On 2021-12-02 10:50, Volodymyr Mytnyk wrote:
> From: Volodymyr Mytnyk<vmytnyk@...vell.com>
>
> Add user template explicit support. At this moment, max
> TCAM rule size is utilized for all rules, doesn't matter
> which and how much flower matches are provided by user. It
> means that some of TCAM space is wasted, which impacts
> the number of filters that can be offloaded.
>
> Introducing the template, allows to have more HW offloaded
> filters.
>
> Example:
> tc qd add dev PORT clsact
> tc chain add dev PORT ingress protocol ip \
> flower dst_ip 0.0.0.0/16
"chain" or "filter"?
> tc filter add dev PORT ingress protocol ip \
> flower skip_sw dst_ip 1.2.3.4/16 action drop
You are not using tc priority? Above will result in two priorities
(the 0.0.0.0 entry will be more important) and in classical flower
approach two different tables.
I am wondering how you map the table to the TCAM.
Is the priority sorting entirely based on masks in hardware?
cheers,
jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists