[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bcb33845-6fff-34c1-9e41-fb611b6f9319@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 20:39:56 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Cc: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Do not terminate SEV-ES guests on GHCB
validation failure
On 12/2/21 20:39, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> Queued, thanks. Though it would have been nicer to split the changes
>> in the return values (e.g. for setup_vmgexit_scratch and
>> sev_es_validate_vmgexit) from the introduction of the new GHCB exitinfo.
>
> I can still do that if it will help make things easier. Let me know.
Well, at this point I've already reviewed it. :)
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists