linux-kernel - [PATCH rcu 6/7] rcu: Make idle entry report expedited quiescent states

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211202001040.3126390-6-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed,  1 Dec 2021 16:10:39 -0800
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 6/7] rcu: Make idle entry report expedited quiescent states

In non-preemptible kernels, an unfortunately timed expedited grace period
can result in the rcu_exp_handler() IPI handler setting the rcu_data
structure's cpu_no_qs.b.exp field just as the target CPU enters idle.
There are situations in which this field will not be checked until after
that CPU exits idle.  The resulting grace-period latency does not qualify
as "expedited".

This commit therefore checks this field upon non-preemptible idle entry in
the rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() function.  It also qualifies the rcu_core()
preempt_count() check with IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) to prevent
false-positive quiescent states from count-free kernels.

Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c        |  2 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 13 ++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index ef8d36f580fc3..a8d1fe35f4820 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2714,7 +2714,7 @@ static __latent_entropy void rcu_core(void)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!rdp->beenonline);
 
 	/* Report any deferred quiescent states if preemption enabled. */
-	if (!(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_MASK)) {
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && (!(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_MASK))) {
 		rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(current);
 	} else if (rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(current)) {
 		set_tsk_need_resched(current);
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 972acb114ce3c..6d715575226f0 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -927,7 +927,18 @@ static bool rcu_preempt_need_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
 {
 	return false;
 }
-static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t) { }
+
+// Except that we do need to respond to a request by an expedited grace
+// period for a quiescent state from this CPU.  Note that requests from
+// tasks are handled when removing the task from the blocked-tasks list
+// below.
+static void rcu_preempt_deferred_qs(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
+
+	if (rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp)
+		rcu_report_exp_rdp(rdp);
+}
 
 /*
  * Because there is no preemptible RCU, there can be no readers blocked,
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23