[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211202064946.1424490-1-yebin10@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 14:49:46 +0800
From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
To: <axboe@...nel.dk>, <asml.silence@...il.com>,
<io-uring@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] io_uring: use timespec64_valid() to verify time value
It's better to use timespec64_valid() to verify time value.
Fixes: 2087009c74d4("io_uring: validate timespec for timeout removals")
Fixes: f6223ff79966("io_uring: Fix undefined-behaviour in io_issue_sqe")
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
---
fs/io_uring.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
index 568729677e25..929ff732d6dc 100644
--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -6151,7 +6151,7 @@ static int io_timeout_remove_prep(struct io_kiocb *req,
return -EINVAL;
if (get_timespec64(&tr->ts, u64_to_user_ptr(sqe->addr2)))
return -EFAULT;
- if (tr->ts.tv_sec < 0 || tr->ts.tv_nsec < 0)
+ if (!timespec64_valid(&tr->ts))
return -EINVAL;
} else if (tr->flags) {
/* timeout removal doesn't support flags */
@@ -6238,7 +6238,7 @@ static int io_timeout_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe,
if (get_timespec64(&data->ts, u64_to_user_ptr(sqe->addr)))
return -EFAULT;
- if (data->ts.tv_sec < 0 || data->ts.tv_nsec < 0)
+ if (!timespec64_valid(&data->ts))
return -EINVAL;
data->mode = io_translate_timeout_mode(flags);
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists