[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211202121554.GY3366@techsingularity.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 12:15:54 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To: Alexey Avramov <hakavlad@...ox.lv>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Darrick Wong <djwong@...nel.org>, regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm: vmscan: Reduce throttling due to a failure to
make progress
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 08:42:29PM +0900, Alexey Avramov wrote:
> I tested this [1] patch on top of 5.16-rc2, the same tests.
>
Thanks for all the tests you've done for this, it's much appreciated.
> - with noswap:
>
> 2021-12-02 19:41:19,279: Stall times for the last 146.5s:
> 2021-12-02 19:41:19,279: -----------
> 2021-12-02 19:41:19,279: some cpu 1.1s, avg 0.8%
> 2021-12-02 19:41:19,279: -----------
> 2021-12-02 19:41:19,279: some io 116.2s, avg 79.3%
> 2021-12-02 19:41:19,280: full io 109.6s, avg 74.8%
> 2021-12-02 19:41:19,280: -----------
> 2021-12-02 19:41:19,280: some memory 3.9s, avg 2.6%
> 2021-12-02 19:41:19,280: full memory 3.8s, avg 2.6%
>
> Excellent!
>
> psi log:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hakavlad/cache-tests/main/516-reclaim-throttle/516-rc2/patch6/noswap/psi
>
> mem log:
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hakavlad/cache-tests/main/516-reclaim-throttle/516-rc2/patch6/noswap/mem
>
> - with swappiness=0
>
> 2021-12-02 19:46:04,860: Stall times for the last 144.5s:
> 2021-12-02 19:46:04,860: -----------
> 2021-12-02 19:46:04,860: some cpu 1.1s, avg 0.8%
> 2021-12-02 19:46:04,860: -----------
> 2021-12-02 19:46:04,860: some io 106.9s, avg 74.0%
> 2021-12-02 19:46:04,861: full io 101.3s, avg 70.1%
> 2021-12-02 19:46:04,861: -----------
> 2021-12-02 19:46:04,861: some memory 99.6s, avg 68.9%
> 2021-12-02 19:46:04,861: full memory 95.6s, avg 66.2%
>
> PSI mem pressure was high, but there were no long stalls.
>
Great, so can I assume you're ok with this version? If yes, can I add
the following?
Tested-by: Alexey Avramov <hakavlad@...ox.lv>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists