[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211202002912.3127710-10-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 16:29:04 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 10/18] rcu: Fix callbacks processing time limit retaining cond_resched()
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
The callbacks processing time limit makes sure we are not exceeding a
given amount of time executing the queue.
However its "continue" clause bypasses the cond_resched() call on
rcuc and NOCB kthreads, delaying it until we reach the limit, which can
be very long...
Make sure the scheduler has a higher priority than the time limit.
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 4f4d9ea6a9cb5..74e210ccfd382 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2525,9 +2525,21 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
/*
* Stop only if limit reached and CPU has something to do.
*/
- if (count >= bl && in_serving_softirq() &&
- (need_resched() || !is_idle_task(current)))
- break;
+ if (in_serving_softirq()) {
+ if (count >= bl && (need_resched() || !is_idle_task(current)))
+ break;
+ } else {
+ local_bh_enable();
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
+ cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
+ lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
+ local_bh_disable();
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Make sure we don't spend too much time here and deprive other
+ * softirq vectors of CPU cycles.
+ */
if (unlikely(tlimit)) {
/* only call local_clock() every 32 callbacks */
if (likely((count & 31) || local_clock() < tlimit))
@@ -2535,13 +2547,6 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
/* Exceeded the time limit, so leave. */
break;
}
- if (!in_serving_softirq()) {
- local_bh_enable();
- lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
- cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
- lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
- local_bh_disable();
- }
}
rcu_nocb_lock_irqsave(rdp, flags);
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists