[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211202130707.3910459-1-liaoyu15@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 21:07:07 +0800
From: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@...wei.com>
To: <john.stultz@...aro.org>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
<liaoyu15@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] time: Normalize timespec64 before timespec64_compare()
Passing unnormalized timespec64 to timespec64_compare() may cause
incorrect results.
For example:
wall_to_monotonic = {tv_sec = -10, tv_nsec = 900000000}
ts_delta = {tv_sec = -9, tv_nsec = -900000000}
timespec64_compare() returns -1, but actually wall_to_monotonic > ts_delta.
This will cause wall_to_monotonic to become a positive number.
Use timespec64_sub() instead of direct subtraction to avoid this.
Signed-off-by: Yu Liao <liaoyu15@...wei.com>
---
include/linux/time64.h | 2 ++
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 +--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/time64.h b/include/linux/time64.h
index 81b9686a2079..f74a36d253cd 100644
--- a/include/linux/time64.h
+++ b/include/linux/time64.h
@@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ static inline int timespec64_equal(const struct timespec64 *a,
* lhs < rhs: return <0
* lhs == rhs: return 0
* lhs > rhs: return >0
+ *
+ * Note: Both lhs and rhs must be normalized.
*/
static inline int timespec64_compare(const struct timespec64 *lhs, const struct timespec64 *rhs)
{
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index b348749a9fc6..dcdcb85121e4 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1306,8 +1306,7 @@ int do_settimeofday64(const struct timespec64 *ts)
timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
xt = tk_xtime(tk);
- ts_delta.tv_sec = ts->tv_sec - xt.tv_sec;
- ts_delta.tv_nsec = ts->tv_nsec - xt.tv_nsec;
+ ts_delta = timespec64_sub(*ts, xt);
if (timespec64_compare(&tk->wall_to_monotonic, &ts_delta) > 0) {
ret = -EINVAL;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists