[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211202141630.rdkrtrltxhzdqtyb@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 15:16:30 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] notifier: Return an error when a callback has already
been registered
On 2021-12-02 14:36:01 [+0100], Borislav Petkov wrote:
> --- a/kernel/notifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/notifier.c
> @@ -19,14 +19,12 @@ BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(reboot_notifier_list);
> * are layered on top of these, with appropriate locking added.
> */
>
> -static int notifier_chain_register(struct notifier_block **nl,
> - struct notifier_block *n)
> +static int __notifier_chain_register(struct notifier_block **nl,
> + struct notifier_block *n)
> {
> while ((*nl) != NULL) {
> - if (unlikely((*nl) == n)) {
> - WARN(1, "double register detected");
> - return 0;
This could be s/0/-EEXIST/ or do I miss something?
I appreciate the updated warning with %ps!
> - }
> + if (unlikely((*nl) == n))
> + return -EEXIST;
> if (n->priority > (*nl)->priority)
> break;
> nl = &((*nl)->next);
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists