[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YajXnjVGEWeUmEqA@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 15:26:38 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] topology/sysfs: only export used sysfs attributes
On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 03:22:05PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 03:03:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 02:03:06PM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > v2:
> > > As requested by Greg KH: avoid negative logic and use uppercase defines.
> > >
> > > v1:
> > > Create die and cluster cpu topology sysfs attributes only if an
> > > architecture makes uses of it, instead of creating them always for all
> > > architectures with bogus default values.
> > > Also change the book and drawer cpu topology macros so they match all
> > > all other topology macros.
> > >
> > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211128212221.1069726-1-hca@linux.ibm.com/
> > >
> > > Heiko Carstens (3):
> > > topology/sysfs: export die attributes only if an architectures has support
> > > topology/sysfs: export cluster attributes only if an architectures has support
> > > topology/sysfs: rework book and drawer topology ifdefery
> > >
> > > Documentation/admin-guide/cputopology.rst | 33 +++++++++++------------
> > > drivers/base/topology.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-----
> > > include/linux/topology.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > Seems entirely reasonable to me,
> >
> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>
> Since there seem to be no objections, who should pick this up?
> I'd assume the s390 tree would not be appropriate.
>
> Andrew, Greg, Peter?
I will take it, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists