lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 2 Dec 2021 16:56:52 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:     X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] notifier: Return an error when a callback has already
 been registered

On Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 10:41:55AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> A patch that adds three new lines of code has got to be simpler than and 
> preferable to a patch that adds about eleven lines (including a whole new 
> function), right?

Well, I like keeping things separate and prefer to keep the error
handling and warning in another function. But Sebastian asked the same
thing already so if people prefer that, I'll change it. I don't feel too
strongly about it, tbh.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ