[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211203130210.f34079f175f28bd1c5c26541@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 13:02:10 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: yongw.pur@...il.com
Cc: bsingharora@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
yang.yang29@....com.cn, wang.yong12@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] delayacct: track delays from memory compact
On Fri, 3 Dec 2021 06:37:52 -0800 yongw.pur@...il.com wrote:
> From: wangyong <wang.yong12@....com.cn>
>
> Delay accounting does not track the delay of memory compact.
> When there is not enough free memory, tasks can spend
> a amount of their time waiting for memory compact.
>
> To get the impact of tasks in direct memory compact, measure
> the delay when allocating memory through memory compact.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/delayacct.h
> +++ b/include/linux/delayacct.h
> @@ -42,8 +42,13 @@ struct task_delay_info {
> u64 thrashing_start;
> u64 thrashing_delay; /* wait for thrashing page */
>
> + u64 compact_start;
> + u64 compact_delay; /* wait for memory compact */
> +
> + u64 freepages_start;
task_delay_info already has a freepages_start, so it fails to compile.
Did you send the correct version?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists