[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86e70da74cb34b59c53b1e5e4d94375c1ef30aa1.camel@debian.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2021 22:06:51 +0000
From: Luca Boccassi <bluca@...ian.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: add signature
On Fri, 2021-12-03 at 11:37 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 11:36 AM Matteo Croce
> <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 8:22 PM Alexei Starovoitov
> > <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 11:18 AM Matteo Croce
> > > <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>
> > > >
> > > > This series add signature verification for BPF files.
> > > > The first patch implements the signature validation in the
> > > > kernel,
> > > > the second patch optionally makes the signature mandatory,
> > > > the third adds signature generation to bpftool.
> > >
> > > Matteo,
> > >
> > > I think I already mentioned that it's no-go as-is.
> > > We've agreed to go with John's suggestion.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > my previous attempt was loading a whole ELF file and parsing it in
> > kernel.
> > In this series I just validate the instructions against a
> > signature,
> > as with kernel CO-RE libbpf doesn't need to mangle it.
> >
> > Which suggestion? I think I missed this one..
>
> This talk and discussion:
> https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/11/contributions/947/
Thanks for the link - but for those of us who don't have ~5 hours to
watch a video recording, would you mind sharing a one line summary,
please? Is there an alternative patch series implementing BPF signing
that you can link us so that we can look at it? Just a link or
googlable reference would be more than enough.
Thank you!
--
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists