[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211203065726.GA3072@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 07:57:26 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC -nxt] mtd_blkdevs: Set GENHD_FL_NO_PART
I think we need the patch below to restore the old behavior where a
partitions scan happens only for those sub-drivers that do report a
partition shift.
MTD maintainers: is this intentional that raw mtdblock does not support
partitions, but the various "FTL" modules do?
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
index 113f86df76038..57a22d2ebaeca 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/mtd_blkdevs.c
@@ -345,6 +345,8 @@ int add_mtd_blktrans_dev(struct mtd_blktrans_dev *new)
gd->first_minor = (new->devnum) << tr->part_bits;
gd->minors = 1 << tr->part_bits;
gd->fops = &mtd_block_ops;
+ if (!tr->part_bits)
+ gd->flags |= GENHD_FL_NO_PART;
if (tr->part_bits)
if (new->devnum < 26)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists