linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Qualcomm clock drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211203015126.40B25C00446@smtp.kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 02 Dec 2021 17:51:24 -0800
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Qualcomm clock drivers

Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-12-02 17:39:01)
> Most SoC specific clock drivers are picked by respective SoC maintainer
> and then sent to the clock maintainers on their way upstream.
> 
> This has however not been the case for the Qualcomm clock drivers -
> which doesn't actually have a maintainer per MAINTAINERS and where the
> framework maintainers have just carried the Qualcomm effort as well,
> presumably as a result of Stephen's history.
> 
> Move the maintainership of the Qualcomm clock drivers to use the same
> model as other SoC vendors and document the ownership by actually
> introducing an entry in MAINTAINERS.
> 
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> ---

Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>