[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yal5tplvcqDjEeTs@builder.lan>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2021 19:58:14 -0600
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, julien.massot@....bzh
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/12] rpmsg: core: send a ns announcement when a
default endpoint is created
On Mon 08 Nov 08:19 CST 2021, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> When a channel is created by user space application with the
> RPMSG_CREATE_DEV_IOCTL controls, a ns announcement has to be sent
> (depending on backend) to inform the remote side that a new service
> is available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> index bdcde57c22f6..63227279397d 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_core.c
> @@ -145,6 +145,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_destroy_ept);
> *
> * This function returns a pointer to an endpoint created and assigned as the default
> * endpoint of the rpmsg device.
> + * If we need to, we also announce about this channel to the remote
> + * processor. This announcement is needed in case the driver is exposing an rpmsg service that has
> + * been created locally.
> *
> * Drivers should provide their @rpdev channel (so the new endpoint would belong
> * to the same remote processor their channel belongs to), an rx callback
> @@ -161,6 +164,7 @@ struct rpmsg_endpoint *rpmsg_create_default_ept(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo)
> {
> struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept;
> + int err = 0;
>
> if (WARN_ON(!rpdev))
> return NULL;
> @@ -183,6 +187,16 @@ struct rpmsg_endpoint *rpmsg_create_default_ept(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev,
> rpdev->ept = ept;
> rpdev->src = ept->addr;
>
> + if (rpdev->ops->announce_create)
> + err = rpdev->ops->announce_create(rpdev);
> + if (err) {
> + rpmsg_destroy_ept(ept);
> + rpdev->ept = NULL;
> + rpdev->src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
> +
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
Unless I'm missing something I think this would be cleaner as:
if (rpdev->ops->announce_create) {
err = rpdev->ops->announce_create(rpdev);
if (err) {
...;
}
}
which also implies that you don't need to zero-initialize err.
Other than that, this looks good and follows what would happen in
rpmsg_dev_probe()...
PS. In rpmsg_dev_probe(), if rpdrv->probe() succeeds but announce_create
returns a failure we will exit the function with an error, which will
just fail really_probe() and we won't ever clean up the device (i.e.
call rpdev->remove()).
Regards,
Bjorn
> return ept;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rpmsg_create_default_ept);
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists