[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQLS4Ev7xChqCMbbJiFZ_kYSB+rbiVT6AJotheFJb1f5=w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 08:44:46 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, david@...hat.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Michal Miroslaw <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 5/5] bpf/progs: replace hard-coded 16 with TASK_COMM_LEN
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 1:53 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> wrote:
>
> static int process_sample(void *ctx, void *data, size_t len)
> {
> - struct sample *s = data;
> + struct sample_ringbuf *s = data;
This is becoming pointless churn.
Nack.
> index 145028b52ad8..7b1bb73c3501 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_kernel.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_kernel.c
> @@ -1,8 +1,7 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> // Copyright (c) 2019 Facebook
>
> -#include <linux/bpf.h>
> -#include <stdint.h>
> +#include <vmlinux.h>
> #include <stdbool.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
> @@ -23,11 +22,11 @@ struct core_reloc_kernel_output {
> int comm_len;
> };
>
> -struct task_struct {
> +struct task_struct_reloc {
Churn that is not even compile tested.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists