[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202112041017.COolnLgE-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2021 10:32:39 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, cohuck@...hat.com, borntraeger@...ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
david@...hat.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 10/17] KVM: s390: pv: add mmu_notifier
Hi Claudio,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on s390/features]
[also build test ERROR on kvm/queue v5.16-rc3 next-20211203]
[cannot apply to kvms390/next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Claudio-Imbrenda/KVM-s390-pv-implement-lazy-destroy-for-reboot/20211204-010121
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git features
config: s390-randconfig-r034-20211203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20211204/202112041017.COolnLgE-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/c2d394c61e53062a1e7ba537029dce61f7a75cff
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Claudio-Imbrenda/KVM-s390-pv-implement-lazy-destroy-for-reboot/20211204-010121
git checkout c2d394c61e53062a1e7ba537029dce61f7a75cff
# save the config file to linux build tree
mkdir build_dir
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash arch/s390/kvm/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/s390/kvm/pv.c: In function 'kvm_s390_pv_init_vm':
>> arch/s390/kvm/pv.c:257:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'mmu_notifier_register'; did you mean 'mmu_notifier_release'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
257 | mmu_notifier_register(&kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier, kvm->mm);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| mmu_notifier_release
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +257 arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
212
213 int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
214 {
215 struct uv_cb_cgc uvcb = {
216 .header.cmd = UVC_CMD_CREATE_SEC_CONF,
217 .header.len = sizeof(uvcb)
218 };
219 int cc, ret;
220 u16 dummy;
221
222 ret = kvm_s390_pv_alloc_vm(kvm);
223 if (ret)
224 return ret;
225
226 /* Inputs */
227 uvcb.guest_stor_origin = 0; /* MSO is 0 for KVM */
228 uvcb.guest_stor_len = kvm->arch.pv.guest_len;
229 uvcb.guest_asce = kvm->arch.gmap->asce;
230 uvcb.guest_sca = (unsigned long)kvm->arch.sca;
231 uvcb.conf_base_stor_origin = (u64)kvm->arch.pv.stor_base;
232 uvcb.conf_virt_stor_origin = (u64)kvm->arch.pv.stor_var;
233
234 cc = uv_call_sched(0, (u64)&uvcb);
235 *rc = uvcb.header.rc;
236 *rrc = uvcb.header.rrc;
237 KVM_UV_EVENT(kvm, 3, "PROTVIRT CREATE VM: handle %llx len %llx rc %x rrc %x",
238 uvcb.guest_handle, uvcb.guest_stor_len, *rc, *rrc);
239
240 /* Outputs */
241 kvm->arch.pv.handle = uvcb.guest_handle;
242
243 atomic_inc(&kvm->mm->context.protected_count);
244 if (cc) {
245 if (uvcb.header.rc & UVC_RC_NEED_DESTROY) {
246 kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(kvm, &dummy, &dummy);
247 } else {
248 atomic_dec(&kvm->mm->context.protected_count);
249 kvm_s390_pv_dealloc_vm(kvm);
250 }
251 return -EIO;
252 }
253 kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle = uvcb.guest_handle;
254 /* Add the notifier only once. No races because we hold kvm->lock */
255 if (kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier.ops != &kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops) {
256 kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier.ops = &kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops;
> 257 mmu_notifier_register(&kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier, kvm->mm);
258 }
259 return 0;
260 }
261
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists